After watching the test match, these are the rules which are to be kept by the ICC:
(1) Ricky Ponting - (THE TRULY GENUINE CRICKETER OF THE CRICKET ERA AND WHOSE INTEGRITY SHOULD NOT BE DOUBTED) should be considered as the FOURTH UMPIRE. As per the new rules, FOURTH UMPIRE decision is final and will over ride any decisions taken by any other umpires. ON-FIELD umpires can seek the assistance of RICKY PONTING even if he is not on the field. This rule is to be made, so that every team should understand the importance of the FOURTH UMPIRE.
(2) While AUSTRALIAN TEAM is bowling, If the ball flies anywhere close to the AUSTRALIAN FIELDER(WITHIN 5 metre distance), the batsman is to be considered OUT irrelevant of whether the catch was taken cleanly or grassed. Any decision for further clarification should be seeked from the FOURTH UMPIRE. This is made to ensure that the cricket is played with SPORTIVE SPIRIT by all the teams.
(3) While BATTING, AUSTRALIAN players will wait for the ON-FIELD UMPIRE decisions only (even if the catch goes to the FIFTH SLIP as the ball might not have touched the bat). Each AUSTRALIAN batsman has to be out FOUR TIMES (minimum) before he can return to the pavilion. In case of THE CRICKETER WITH INTEGRITY, this can be higher.
(4) UMPIRES should consider a huge bonus if an AUSTRALIAN player scores a century. Any wrong decisions can be ignored as they will be paid huge bonus and will receive the backing of the AUSTRALIAN team and board.
symonds score = 162 actually out but not given = 30 official stats = aus win by 122 runs
162 - 30 = 132 (umpire blessed 132 extra runs to aus along with 2 more life)
132 - 122 = 10 (so india won by 10 runs)
also count other 9 errors by jokers umpires, and given 2 out to indian batsmen being no balls and decisions went against indian batsmen in 2nd innings dravid, ganguly, r.p. singh etc.
do all stats and tell me in actual australia lost the match by how many runs
After watching the test match, these are the rules which are to be kept by the ICC:
(1) Ricky Ponting %u2013 (THE TRULY GENUINE CRICKETER OF THE CRICKET ERA AND WHOSE INTEGRITY SHOULD NOT BE DOUBTED) should be considered as the FOURTH UMPIRE. As per the new rules, FOURTH UMPIRE decision is final and will over ride any decisions taken by any other umpires. ON-FIELD umpires can seek the assistance of RICKY PONTING even if he is not on the field. This rule is to be made, so that every team should understand the importance of the FOURTH UMPIRE.
(2) While AUSTRALIAN TEAM is bowling, If the ball flies anywhere close to the AUSTRALIAN FIELDER(WITHIN 5 metre distance), the batsman is to be considered OUT irrelevant of whether the catch was taken cleanly or grassed. Any decision for further clarification should be seeked from the FOURTH UMPIRE. This is made to ensure that the cricket is played with SPORTIVE SPIRIT by all the teams.
(3) While BATTING, AUSTRALIAN players will wait for the ON-FIELD UMPIRE decisions only (even if the catch goes to the FIFTH SLIP as the ball might not have touched the bat). Each AUSTRALIAN batsman has to be out FOUR TIMES (minimum) before he can return to the pavilion. In case of THE CRICKETER WITH INTEGRITY, this can be higher.
(4) UMPIRES should consider a huge bonus if an AUSTRALIAN player scores a century. Any wrong decisions can be ignored as they will be paid huge bonus and will receive the backing of the AUSTRALIAN team and board.
Asian team for the bigest tuff in cricket. but aussie is world team in world becouse he PM& Ministre in support Murli is chakar Bower saiod PM MR Haward why he doing said & ICC what a spport that time? Why,, no any person or comminoti & that time bhaggi also chkar & than used tech. & video, at that time GANGULY is out & D.Clark said out, Ganguly gone why not used by B Benson tech. & video? that time third ump. & aussie players WIfe meeting or what doing? shame on you Bhaggi& Mo. Shaymonds tocking that time baf. haden willbe stand by thair or sachin ? haaa but ICC Comminoti NOT WATCH VIDEO CILIP Because EARLY NIGHT MEETING FOR aussie players Wife Speshali Haden, ponting, clark & YAK shaymonds mike Proktor refarifor this match he is Speshali ghay this avery layer person he tits by PAk playre rashid latif five match no play ? beacouse he said Ban alok kapali gone & at that time funki r lada ponting Ganguly Gone Why Not he Fine by thir Test ? bhaggi Fine by thir Test. ICC IS A VERY POUR & BCCI IS VERY HIGHER BY MANY. Not only I AM very gilty fill but also this is reality . its FACT:& FACT:& FACT:& he is kinner
Umpire means person having power in cricket same thing is going on the umpire is changing the entire match situation. ICC has to change the term Umpire and put a name as valentator or some other just for to count balls carry bowlers accessories all other things should be done by Technology which will display the result on SCREEN as soon as ball completd. There should a person who observe things as which is third umpire is doing now and he has to correct the things if any technical problem occurs by seeing Video replies. What do u say friends
RE:Gully Cricket
by Chandhra Shekar on Jan 09, 2008 08:17 PM
you have forgot to add one more thing on Indians, they play not only for entertainment, excitement ? (it's exaggeration) and certainly not for health but only for wealth, where as Oz plays only for one thing i.e., for nation pride. shekar (Hyderabad.)
RE:Gully Cricket
by Chandhra Shekar on Jan 09, 2008 08:34 PM
knowing them as criminals and playing with them clearly shows that we Indians are more interested to learn about crime.
One thing that I can't reconcile is how the Indian team and the Indian cricket board can talk about honour, can talk about the spirit of the game, when they are all acting like spoilt, petulant children who are threatening to take their bat and ball and go home. Not to mention a pathetic tit-for-tat reporting of Hogg. Is there honour in subverting the ICC, in making a mockery of it and so inviting every other cricketing nation to throw a childish hissy fit any time they don't like the way things have turned out? As things stand, we may aswell get rid of the ICC and just leave everything up to the BCCI. They obviously call all the shots, so we may aswell dispense with the farce that has become the ICC. I find it completely ridiculous the amount of lambasting of the Australian players that is going on while the Indians are making a complete mockery out of the game and any sense of good sportsmanship.
RE:RE:double speak
by mmspm on Jan 09, 2008 08:26 PM
i am not surprised by ur post. u proved u r menon
@australian posters and australian fans
symonds score = 162 actually out but not given = 30 official stats = aus win by 122 runs
162 - 30 = 132 (umpire blessed 132 extra runs to aus along with 2 more life)
132 - 122 = 10 (so india won by 10 runs)
also count other 9 errors by jokers umpires, and given 2 out to indian batsmen being no balls and decisions went against indian batsmen in 2nd innings dravid, ganguly, r.p. singh etc.
do all stats and tell me in actual australia lost the match by how many runs
RE:World Record
by Manoj K Menon on Jan 09, 2008 08:23 PM
that you should be asking mr vinayak who is callously claiming that it was a fixed match. Australians doesnt need to do all these to win. Remember that it was our fellow countrymen and southafricans who were charged with match rigging
RE:World Record
by . on Jan 09, 2008 11:53 PM
issue is fixing by umpires. fixing by umpires in sydney test, they r hand in glove with all the boards/icc. all this racial abuse is for diverting the attention from the main problem. plz recall the statements of bcci during the test match. first day bcci 'directs' the team management to lodge protest against the bad umpiring. (as if team cant do it on their own). the very next day (2nd day of the test), they backtrack n ask team not to protest.
May be all of you are correct to say that bucknor faulted in giving out to ganguly,dravid and rp singh. but why nobody talk about non performance of three guys who are hereos in india. dhoni,jaffer and yuvraj. they failed in 4 innings and still got away saying bucknor/ponting done all that. i am not supporting australians. see if india still loses in perth where we will blame? think of that. of 6 batsmen we have only 3 performed in 2 test matched and the rest were reduced to cookies against brilliant bowlingof Lee and Co. if that was solved we would have won or atleat put up a good contest. i am again putting that i am not supporting australia, i am dead against playing in australia against them. but it is cricket we will have play everywhere. so keep discuss in this way
