Above calculations are wrong for the case if Bermuda bats first and get all out on 50, If BD makes those run in 5 overs then BD will overtake India NRR.
At present NRR: India = 5 (commulative, 2 matches) BD = -4 (commulative, 2 matches)
If india beats SL by narrow margin say 1 run or in the last ball then their NRR remain same as 5 (commulative, 3 matches).
So BD has to cover a difference of 9 (-4 to 5).
if Bermuda gets out on 50, it means their RR is 1 in that match. so if BD makes that runs in 5 overs it means their RR is 10. So the difference is 9 (10-1). In tat case BD will overtake India
RE:Wrong Calculation
by Siva on Mar 22, 2007 07:26 PM Permalink
You are wrong. The net run rate is calculated based on the run rate managed from the number of overs used by a team - the run rate managed in the number of overs by its opponents ( in all the matches that was played).
RE:Wrong Calculation
by sameer naik on Mar 22, 2007 07:23 PM Permalink
lol...not that easy...else everyone wud have loved to bat second...This is not how the cumulative averages are calculated. Its the total of runs .... leave it i dont have the patience to explain..check some of the bloags somewhere
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Wrong Calculation
by sameer naik on Mar 22, 2007 08:06 PM Permalink
lets just bet, if i explain, then i dont think you will want to bet ;)
RE:Wrong Calculation
by Jay on Mar 22, 2007 07:38 PM Permalink
You are wrong. Brush up your math. It's not the average of NRRs in each match, it is NRR for all the matches.
RE:RE:Wrong Calculation
by Pankaj Garg on Mar 22, 2007 07:57 PM Permalink
you are on right track Jay. NRR is calculated in each match then added for all matches.
