Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
india
by j p on Mar 22, 2007 07:02 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

rahul hv to drop spin bowler and uththapa and they hv to include shreesant and pathan n karthik.
shresanth in place of agarkar
pathan in place of robin utthappa
karthik is in place of spinner

still we hv spin bowling option of sachin,yuvi and sehwag so we dont need any special spin bowler.. but we need to hv even more depth in batting as out unpredictable batting

any way we r weak in bowling department its not make any diff if sachin is bowling or kumble or harbhajan or rahul dravid itself


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:india
by Rishi Sharma on Mar 22, 2007 07:05 PM   Permalink
What about spending 11 million dollars on sri lanka.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:india
by Pooja K on Mar 22, 2007 07:03 PM   Permalink
Rahul Dravid bowling....LOL! I have tremedous respect for Dravid but that was hilarious.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:india
by Pankaj Garg on Mar 22, 2007 07:12 PM   Permalink
right pooja.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:india
by j p on Mar 22, 2007 07:17 PM   Permalink
pooja what i mean to say is no differece to opposition...
as kumble,harbhajan r not the best ever rahul dravid can bowl better than them
so exclude them from team and inclued batsmans as we hv other bowling option like sachin,sehwag,yuvi
and pathan is allrounder....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:india
by Pooja K on Mar 22, 2007 07:22 PM   Permalink
Anoop, I had no idea. Thanks for bringing that to my attention ;) j p, but dont you feel that part-timers lack the capability to take wickets in the middle overs? Often this has been the case. India gets 2 to 3 quick breakthroughs but then there are loooong partnerships because the opposition exploits the part-timers. We need a regular bowler who can take wickets between 25-40 overs. Kumble...I dont know, for some reason he keeps bowling 1 bad ball per over ( often down the leg side, as witnessed with Bermuda). Harbhajan, if he gets a wicket early in his spell, can be a handful.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:india
by Anoop KN on Mar 22, 2007 07:15 PM   Permalink
dont laugh, pooja.
rahul was the key bowler for the ODI vs SA in kochi in march 2000.
http://www.yehhaicricket.com/odiscorecard/oneday/1572.html

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:india
by desi bhai on Mar 22, 2007 07:31 PM   Permalink
wasnt that the same match in which it was suspected of bookie's role... ?
Hmmmmm Dravid bowling and Jadeja scoring 90 odd runs...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:india
by prakash dialani on Mar 22, 2007 07:25 PM   Permalink
POOJA U ARE NOT A TRUE INDIAN IF U SAY SO.EAST OR WEST INDIA IS BEST.KEEP YOUR TRUST ON THEM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:india
by Pooja K on Mar 22, 2007 07:32 PM   Permalink
No Prakash, its not a matter of trusting or not. I'm being realistic. Like every other true Indian I will be hoping and praying for an Indian win tomorrow, it's cautious optimism.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
India chances: What numbers say