It has become a habit of non congress parties to say congress has not done anything for past 50 years and they are doing everything in a very short span. It is a lie and fallacy. For centuries we were exploited by Mughals and Europeans. When we attained freedom, we had not resources to run the country. British government had produced brilliant clerks and nothing more. Government had to invest on Education, Industrialization, Agriculture and things like that. With all the limitations India has done well. Compare India with those countries that got freedom with India or little later, most of them have become bankrupt. The real change came with India developing indegenous technologies. All those were started with Mr. Nehru as Prime Minister. Rajiv Gandhi's era saw a major revolution in terms of telecommunication. All the road side phone booths were started by him. Later when Indian economy had almost collapsed, it was the then Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh under Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao who brought necessary changes to bring stability to Indian Economy. Later governments just followed what Dr. Manmohan Singh did. BJP which was always opposing foreign investments and always said swadeshi started falling in line with Liberal Economy and saw success. Mr. George Fernandes who was the opponent of Colas did not raise his voice agains t MNC's under NDA regime. What I say is everyone has contributed to the development of India. Indian missiles, tankers, and military ha
RE:Chronological fallacy
by amar preet on Dec 13, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
what congress? just take a birth in gandhi faimly & become king of india. People like u touching the foots of rahul & say jai-hind. manmohan singh is a working like a home-servant of sonia gandhi.she did'nt know how to wear a saree that's why she take the help of arjun singh,manmohan singh,kapil sibbal. u also admiring congress bcoz u also want to become a home servant of sonia gandhi.
RE:RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 03:47 PM Permalink
Similarly BJP is functioning like the slave of sangh parivar. It is ridiculous to know chief ministerial candidate or any other persons should be endorsed by sangh parivar. It is the mockery of democracy.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by Rajendra Deshpande on Dec 13, 2007 03:51 PM Permalink
My dear friend You havnot properly read my comments. Like you I also hate congress and Gandhi Family. You rightly said that some body with Gandhi name can become a prime minister. But at the same time I appreciate Dr. Manmohan Singh also. He is a " Right man surrounded by thief, Dacoit, Murder". Congressman will not allow him to work and will always pull his leg.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 04:04 PM Permalink
There is nothing wrong when someone from some family become prime minister or great leader. When Natwar Singh was a congress minister BJP tried to attack him (verbally) in parliament. When he was thrown out of congress, BJP tried its level best to woo him. Overnight a sinner became a saint. Similar thing with Sukh Ram. No political party is different in India. Ananth Kumar of BJP is named in HUDCO scam. Many BJP and non BJP legislators were involved, (even from Gujarat) were involved in human trafficing. There are good people in every party there are thugs in every party.
RE:RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 05:13 PM Permalink
u know who was home minister of state in gujarat during riots..check on web. BJP just try to remove natwar from congress and wants that he opened some facts of congress, but he was true congressi.. he kept silence of his own curruptoin as well other congressi leaders curruption
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 05:42 PM Permalink
But BJP wanted him in their party as soon as he was thrown out of the party. So also they wanted Sukh Ram after he was removed from congress. BJP is equally corrupt.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 06:21 PM Permalink
No they have nt tried to keep natwar in party. provide link to support this news in which any bjp leader ask...might be some biased media must be came into in ndtv reporter's mind
RE:Chronological fallacy
by Vismay on Dec 14, 2007 11:32 AM Permalink
Whoever may be the home minister, under a dictator like Modi all other offices are defunct.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 03:28 PM Permalink
Then why that effect is not coming is in following state where still congress or other party rules 1) West bengal, Orissa, NE states, Bihar, UP, Tamilnadu, Kerala...
Only states which are on progress routes are ruled by BJP in last 5-10 years. I am not biased but try to see the facts. Tell me any state which has done bad during BJP tenure. Answer is none
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 03:44 PM Permalink
Karnataka saw rapid progress during congress chief minister Mr. S.M. Krishna. Andhra Pradesh saw rapid development when Mr. Chandra Babu Naidu was the chief Minister. Kerala is not far behind. UP was ruled by BJP what did they do? Madhya Pradesh has not become a super state. Gujarat has developed not because of BJP but because of the people of Gujarat. Travel through out the world you will find it out. Where ever Gujaratis have gone they have progressed. They are very enterprising and self motivated. Orissa is ruled by NDA partner only. It is the total participation of people that takes a state forward and not a particular party or government. Governments will be catalysts. That is all.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 05:10 PM Permalink
Who told u karnataka got progrees, only one city banglore, made progress.. Andhra only hyderabad..And UP has made progress in the rule of kalyan singh.. he has also make rules strict against crime, copying during exams but they loose bcoz in UP muzzies % are more who loves crime, and hindus are not giving vote and not united. so mr kalyansingh lost. otherwise UP made goodprogress in that rule ask any body over there. Rajasthan and MP is doing quite goodd, check statstics..
RE:Chronological fallacy
by kashifa naqvi on Dec 14, 2007 01:50 PM Permalink
HELLO MR.KHUKHAR SHYAD AAP LOG BJP SE LINK HAI, THATS WHY U R TALKING WRONG MR. KALYAN SINGH KA JP PERIOD THA WOH SHYAD UP KA SAB SE BURA PERIOD THA, LIKE AS VIR BADHUR SING KA ZAMANE JAISE HI THA. UP ME NO DEVELOPMENT,NO PROGRESS,ONLY BAD POLITICS HAI ONLY, JO KUCH DEVELOPMENT THA WOH SHYAD BEFORE MANDAL COMMISSION HOCKUKA THA. USKE BAAD TO JO KUCH BHI HUWA HAI WOH SAAB KE SAMNE HAI. NOIDA KA DEVELOPMENT HORATH WOH BHI KALYAN SINGH KI HI RAAJ MAIN SAAB KHATAM HOGYA AUR SARA DEVELOPMENT SAAB GURGAON (HARYANA)MAIN HOGAY HAI. AGAR MERI BAAT PER BHAROSA NAHO TO PHIR HARYAN BJP SE ZARROR MALUM KARLO. BJP (BHARASHT JAN PARTY HAI YEHA DEVELOPMENT NHAI BHAI YEHA AAM HINDUSTANI LOGO MAIN COMMUNAL FEELING PAIDA KARKAR LADWANA JANTI HAI. AUR WAISE BHI ADVANI AUR ZEYAD TAR NETA PAKISTANI HAI(WOH BHI SIND SE) AB AAP KHUD SAMAJLO YAAR YEHA PAKISTAN SE AYYE HAI AAP AUR HUM PER RAAJ KAR RAHI HAI BHAI(AGAR SONIA GANDHI VEDESHI HAI TO PHIR ADVANI BHI VEDASHI HAI) AUR EK PAKISTANI HUM LOGO KO LADWARAHAI SAMJHO BAAT KO MERI BHAI. HAMARI TAQAT HAMARI EK JUKTA MAIN HAI NE KI APPAS MAIN LADNE SE HAI.AB CHAYA WOH KALYAN SINGH HO YEHA PHIR ADVANI INKA MATLAB SIRF HINDU AUR MUSLIM KO APAS ME LADWAN HAI. AUR KOI BHI RELIGON LADNE KI BAAT NAHI KART HAI. AAP KO ISLAM KE BARE MAIN KEYA MALUM HAI.AGAR KISE BHI RELIGON KO BURA BOLNA HAI TO PHIR PEHLAY USEK BARE MAIN STUDY KARO PHIR KOI BHI COMMENT KARO. I MEAN TO SAY STUDY HARD & THEN COMMENT KARO. I THINK U R BETTER UNDER STAND.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 05:56 PM Permalink
I have lived in Karnataka during SM Krishna's rule and I know what I mean. A decade rule of BJP in UP has not done anything great. Visit MP and see the jungle raj there. In Gujarat people themselves are enterprising. IN UK, US and other parts of the globe, people from Gujarat have excelled in all areas of life. They have lifted Gujarat to newer heights and it is not Modi or BJP. Even prior to BJP rule it was the most Industrialised state and well maintained state.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 06:14 PM Permalink
decade in up,when alone BJP ruled? u r wrong... karnataka, y congress loose if he was doing good. Congress can never do good for any state. They are currupt. Check the wealth of any congressi before entering in politics and current u will be amazed. y gujarat has not progressed earlier, y in last 5-6 year, i live in gujarat, i know better then u, how much progress happened. I visited banlore also last to last year, where no infrastructure crumbled. travel 5 km from airport require an hour, in ahemdaad it require 1/4 of that, and i thnk population wiseboth are almost equal
RE:Chronological fallacy
by Rajendra Deshpande on Dec 13, 2007 03:29 PM Permalink
My dear friends, I feel Mr.Narendra Modi is the most eligible man to become Chief Minister of Gujarat, no... no Prime Minister of India. Look at the development he has done in Gujarat. Some people argue that it is due to the Dr. Manmohan Singh's policy, but his policies are for all the state of India then why only Gujarat is making progress. Take any issues, you will find a very clear and foresighted stand of Mr.Narendra Modi. Sardar Sarover, terrorism any issue, best leader to tackle is Mr.Narendra Modi. I am a Maharashtrian and living in West Bengal, therefore I may not be emotional about Gujarat election, but whenever the name of Mr.Narendra Modi is there I just get glued to the T.V or News paper. I really like the dynamism, decision making and shroudness of this person. Even his opposition parties like Left (CPM) they set the example of Gujarat and follow it as a Idol for them. It is not a joke. Buddhadeb Bhattacharji (CM-West Bengal) addressed to his party man in one of the meeting that West Bengal should set Gujarat as is its standerd. What else you want as certificate (so called) when your opponent are appriciating your progress that too in India? I hope India will get many more leaders like Narendra Modi but unfortunatly we don't have many more outstanding people in our society. They are always few, that is why they are great.
