Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
WHY JARKAND,CHATTISGADH,UTTARANCHAL...BUT NOT TELANGANA?
by yuva on Jan 25, 2008 09:27 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Some People who doesn't know about telangana problems says that "dont divide the country"
You gave Jarkandh,Uttaranchal and chattisghad.....what if u give telangana for genuine reasons.....

If that is the case why andra pradesh was created,by seperating from Madras state?
DO one thing form Madras state again by combining coastal andhra into chennai and form HYDERABAD STATE again as which was in 1958

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:WHY JARKAND,CHATTISGADH,UTTARANCHAL...BUT NOT TELANGANA?
by Konda Rao on Jan 25, 2008 09:32 AM   Permalink
Jarkhand, Chattisgarh are predominantly Tribal states. Uttaranchal was separated for religious reasons. It is 99% Hindu. They are very different issues. Telangana problem on the other hand is a over blown myth. If there is a problem of inequal development sort it out like a man, not run away like coward Jinnah.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:WHY JARKAND,CHATTISGADH,UTTARANCHAL...BUT NOT TELANGANA?
by Indian on Jan 25, 2008 09:37 AM   Permalink
JARKAND,CHATTISGADH,UTTARANCHA, the worst hit naxal areas in the country, small makes paradise for naxals, is ther any sort of developemtn in 3 small states formed recently JARKAND,CHATTISGADH,UTTARANCHA....100% nothing and thease 3 are Naxal factories

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Delhi will come to the TRS' doorsteps'