Small states are definetly good from a management perspective as the government can focus on them. Its a different story that politicians want them for their own benefit.
RE:RE:Small States
by Sreekanth Reddy on Jan 24, 2008 07:31 PM Permalink
How about Punjab, Himachal pradesh, haryana developed after getting seperated from other states?
Mr Knonda rao why can't you guys go back to chennai afterall you guys belong to the same thread.
RE:Small States
by Hi on Jan 24, 2008 07:41 PM Permalink
Punjab, Kerala, Goa Bigger states? In Andhra,Telangana resources, Jobs, water, people are exploited by other people. Now those so called other people do not want the separate state as their sucking will stop
RE:RE:Small States
by Hi on Jan 24, 2008 07:50 PM Permalink
Howmany states are there speaking hindi? Its for pure exploitation by other region leaders that they don't want TELANGANA. Some people for business interest, some people for fearing loss of govt jobs for Telangana people and for some giving Telangana its due water resources.
Finally if not today TELANGANA will be created definitely and we will teach other region how fast and better we can develop. Development doesn't mean having swanky offices or IT park, its increasing the income level of all class of people, providing better water for farmers, sharing power, ruling your own region, having jobs in ur state.
RE:Small States
by aska simon sadanand on Jan 24, 2008 06:44 PM Permalink
Accept the fact it helps in better governence, it takes time do t expect wonders in couple of years,
RE:Small States
by Konda Rao on Jan 24, 2008 06:47 PM Permalink
But they are formed as separate states because each of those states have more than 40% tribals. Tribals have special rights according to constitution. Telangana problem is that of dialect and culture which is highly exaggerated.
RE:Small States
by aska simon sadanand on Jan 24, 2008 06:53 PM Permalink
Jarkand issues was Tribals here the primary issue is Regional Imbalance in Economy again its not culture , relgion or caste that matters.
RE:Small States
by Konda Rao on Jan 24, 2008 06:57 PM Permalink
I agree to the imbalance in economy. But there are more than 100 MLA's from Telangana. If they are made to work properly, for the development of the region, separation doesn't arise. The Telangana movement in a way can be helpful in awakening the people of their state, and i hope it will be used to develop the region in the bounds of AP rather than separating. Many issues arise if Telangana forms a new state. First thing is, it will separate the crores of Telugus in Telangana from their Telugu speaking brethern and dilute the essence of Telugu in the new formed state. Urdu speaking Muslims will benefit from it more than anybody.
RE:Small States
by sushma on Jan 24, 2008 07:12 PM Permalink
there are more than 8 states of hindi speaking, and two tamil speaking states then why dont have two telugu speaking states, telugu and urdu are mingiled with culture of the tenlagana people, by seperting telanga, they gets their wate for irrigation wich is for them, the land also. but there is no way to made hyd as union territory or common capital etc etc .
RE:Small States
by Kappu on Jan 24, 2008 06:58 PM Permalink
Kaapu people are born to win, One day a Kaapu will rule A.P under his rule A.P will become like Japan and Germany
RE:Small States
by Truth Seeker on Jan 24, 2008 07:03 PM Permalink
You seem to be quite ignorant. Problem of Telangana is it's being neglected and it's resources and the funds are being used by Andhra leaders for betterment of their region. Whose money do you think YSR is spending to make his constituency ultra modern with flyovers? Do you think such small town needs such spending of whole states people's money? Think before you write.
RE:RE:Small States
by Truth Seeker on Jan 24, 2008 07:06 PM Permalink
Konda Rao, your stupidity shouldn't be an excuse. Don't distorting the truth as if you are from a different state. Your suggestions didn't help Telangana for so long. Government is run by Andhra people. They are using their money to have a hold on the funds and development of Telangana is unfortunately in the hands of selfish Andhra leaders. As long as there is no separate state of Telangana, it will not develop. It was in much better state before Andhra joined in.
RE:Small States
by Anniyan on Jan 24, 2008 07:21 PM Permalink
I have a question,How come these funds can be utilized by getting a seperate State?. Are states not fighting for central funds?. Be ready for this in future if Telangana comes (it will i know ) a) Central Congress govt is biased towards Andhra State and doing nothing for Telagana state b) Fight for all petty issues like TN and karnataka are doing and most importantly one more Small state issue it will be Seperate Adilabad or some kindaa of emotional issue. Truth seeker despite all of us being so educated we failed to ask right questions to the Politicians and they exploit this Ask Mr KCR or whoever a)What steps did he take as TRS or as TDP member for Telagana forget Tel.. for his constiuency.b) Ask him does he have any plan to solve problems of Telagana c)How is going to solve agri problems d)And ask him why is fighting for some Govt jobs when we know pretty well that % of jobs created by Govt is pretty low. e) How is going to solve water problem of Telagana? has he heard of something called Water harvesting in his life time?
RE:Small States
by Konda Rao on Jan 24, 2008 07:10 PM Permalink
You don't make the least sense. Andhra has about equal members in state assembly as Telangana. I am from Telangana.
RE:Small States
by aska simon sadanand on Jan 24, 2008 07:15 PM Permalink
FINALY ALL T PEOPLE UNITE FOR A SEPERTAE STATE, we will definetly be on par with SIN in 10 years if we have our seperate state, do not trust any politi from Andhra or Telagana. Its is for our future we should have a seperate state
