Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by stav on Oct 16, 2007 09:17 AM   Permalink
I agree with you being a hindu, I dont find any difference in the agendas of VHP or the Taliban. Both of them are narrow, both of them are against freedom, both of them are against liberalism, both of the are against women rights. Religion should be kept at home and not bought into politics and the streets, it keeps both religion and the street clean.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by Kumaraswamy Pillay on Oct 16, 2007 09:36 AM   Permalink
saala modi against rights of muslims. saale ko 7 din keliye afganisthan bhejo, tab pata chalega, talibaan kya hota hai aur freedom kya hoti hai. bada aagaya batiyane keliye, gaddhar hindustan ka

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by RamGopalVarmaKi DAG on Oct 16, 2007 09:21 AM   Permalink
Both of you go to pakistan or bangladesh and see there whats happening and you Satv dont act as u r a secular, salaaa chutiyaaaa hai thu

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by stav on Oct 16, 2007 09:25 AM   Permalink
RamGopalVarmakiGandd, apna mooh bandh rakh. We should send rascals like you to islamic countries, there life style and philosophy suits you best.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by Kumaraswamy Pillay on Oct 16, 2007 09:37 AM   Permalink
so you agree that only rascals live in islamic countries. looks like you finally realized your mistake.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by James Bond on Oct 16, 2007 09:36 AM   Permalink
Muslims are voting for Congress and secular parties because their leaders read Kalma with your clergy in mosque and these leaders in return get votes. This is your secularism.

If RSS, BJP, VHP are right wing and according to you enemy no. 1 of muslims can you quote or show one photo where a hindu has hijacked a plane, where RSS or VHP guy is standing with a machine gun or any anti-national poster. You want freedom for yourself but when it comes to freedom of speech for others like Tasleema Nasreen then it hurts you. Problem is within you and that is why globally it is one versus muslim fight. You cut your child forehead and allow him to bleed so that he gets a seat in Jannat. Bloody hell what a philosphy! You are following philosphy of horse traders who are by luck rich today.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by stav on Oct 16, 2007 09:19 AM   Permalink
At the same time I would like to point out to my muslim bretheren, that radicvalism in Hinduism is a response to Islamic radicalism. You will always have the VHP in India, the BNP in England etc etc as long as you have radicalism in Islam. All these radicalism in anti hindu in the first place.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by Sumanta Deb on Oct 16, 2007 09:09 AM   Permalink
You are mistaken --- there is the mother of all right wing Muslim parties in Gujarat --- The Congress, the Samajwadi Party and the CPI-M

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by prayaag pathare on Oct 16, 2007 09:18 AM   Permalink
Bajrang dal, Shiv Sena, RSS are not terror based parties as you claim. Have you seen all these party members carrying AK-47 guns & attacking innocent people or any army camps like your islamic terrorist do in the name of religion?
Have they brought down any building by crashing aircrafts like islamic terrorist do? Parties like Bajrang dal, Shiv Sena, RSS etc. fight for rights of Hindus if they are discrimineted & that also protesting in true democratic way. Any religion Hindu or islam do not permit terror & all knows that.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by S S on Oct 16, 2007 09:09 AM   Permalink
The %u201987 riots in Meerut, 88 in Muradabad, %u201989 in Bhagalpur, 1992-93 in Bombay caused more than 10,000 lives of hindus. All these riots were started by muslims on behest of congress and secular forces. Perpetuator of Godhra should not be allowed to rule the nation. Hindus can't live in India without BJP. Secular forces are ready to sell the nation for the sake of muslim votes. Congress and commies secular gangs are of the opinion that Abrogating Article 370 from Kashmir would alienate 14 crore Indian Muslims outside J&K. 3,00,000 hindus died in Kashmir in the hands of muslims in the name of Allaah and these shameless islamist secular hindus are targetting Avtaari Purush Modi for saving the lives of Hindus. If muslims are such a decent religion then why the heck they are starting riots almost everywhere ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Who is More Tolerant??
by Kumaraswamy Pillay on Oct 16, 2007 09:16 AM   Permalink
If in your idea if congressis are secular party then i will give you some facts.
Biggest culprits in mishandling partition -> 10 millions murdered in india, pakistan & bangladesh.
Unnecessary emergency --> scores of people driven in to poverty, unemployment and ultimately to death.
1984 sikh riots --> more than 5000 sikhs killed in matter of days.

You know what. These congressis mislead muslims like you and other minorities and make a big bakra out of yourself. Tell me how many of your community brethern benefitted from congressi policies in their 55 years of rule after independence. What have the other pseudo-secularist fcukers like communists, laloo prasad and karunanidhi done for you guys. Everytime they rub thel on your head during election time and do nothing for you guys. Another fact to remind you. Around 83% of this country is hindus. If all hindus vote for BJP then it should comfortably win every election. Has it ever happend like that, no. What the statistics says is that fools like you are getting cheated by the so called secular parties who are slow-poison for this country. Before you blame BJP for demolishing babri-masjid dont forget that once upon a time your grandpa babar also did the same, demolished a hindu temple and built a mosque. That proves that you guys were no different when the power was in your hands. Aur rahi baat gujarat riots ki, who started that in the first place. One muslim fanatic party called muslim league was responsible for partition.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Modi has nothing to do with Hindutva'