Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
To Ramakrishna Panicker
by Anand Iyer on Jun 05, 2007 11:07 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Yudhishtira insisted that the Dog following him should be allowed into heaven along with him. So if Dog is allowed in heaven, it is allowed in temple.

As for non-hindus. when Lord Krishna says that "I am equally present in all beings-none is dear to me or hated by me"(Gita, 9:29), then how can u bar non-hindus from temple?


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by Inadvertently Human on Jun 05, 2007 11:14 AM   Permalink
When you are in my house you play by my rules. When you are in the Lord's house you play by his rules.

If he is particular about it, why not take him to ISKCON Temple? Why pick a tradtional Namboodri Temple?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by Ramakrishna Panicker on Jun 05, 2007 11:35 AM   Permalink
Dear Inadvertently Human,

We feel that you are so nevervous on yourselves. Please cool down for a while then say.

If you entertain, see what says Adi Shankaracharyas 100th verses of Soundryalahari:

PRADEEPA GWALABHI DIVASAKARA NEERAJANAVIDHIM,

SUDHA DHUDHESH CHANDROPALA JALALAVAIRARGHYARACHANA,

SWOKEEYAIRAMBHOMBHIM SALILANIDHI SOUHITHYAKARANAM

TWADEEYABHIR WAGBHIR THAWA JANANI VACHAM SHTUTIRIYAM.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by Anand Iyer on Jun 05, 2007 11:22 AM   Permalink
www.faithfreedom.org.No I am not pesudo secular. I am aware of the woinderful job that your website is doing. I have read your site.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by Ramakrishna Panicker on Jun 05, 2007 11:21 AM   Permalink
To Mr. anand Iyer,

Kindly note that me equally respect all human beings irrespective of caste or religion. Please understand, that was somebodies message me reproduced. See the above message once again. Sorry for annoyance caused.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by biz Narayan on Jun 05, 2007 11:24 AM   Permalink
Mr Panicker, Do you equally respect hindu fundamentalists too ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by Ramakrishna Panicker on Jun 05, 2007 11:50 AM   Permalink
Dear Mr. Narayan,
I dont know really your fundamentalists word indicates, but one thing is sure the fundamentalists are at their place and others something far. We know that a nut shell has its own limits, only in better atmosphere only it opens its mouth otherwise it shrinks into its shell. So we give grace marks that all.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:To Ramakrishna Panicker
by biz Narayan on Jun 05, 2007 11:22 AM   Permalink
Krishna never said I am "Equaly".... Iyer is a marxist stooge, is ready to become a false prophet. He is half converted to ideology. Iyer wouldn;t know in this life what went wrong with that interpretation.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'It is Brahminical arrogance'