Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Agaya Raman!
by JonBonJovi on Dec 28, 2007 06:50 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

All the jihadi organisations were opposed to her coming to power firstly because she was a woman and, secondly, because of her statements that she would allow US troops to hunt for Osama bin Laden in Pakistani territory and let the International Atomic Energy Agency interrogate nuclear scientist A Q Khan..
1- Mr Raman u forgot when she was elected Jamiat U Islam Fazal ur rehman supported him the cheif of a large islamic organisation was a coalition with her. so being a woman she got elected 2ice as a PM!so just cut thing out and just dont write irresponsibily!the reason ill give in the end!
2- IEAE interogate A Q Khan? are u kidding me if he is interogated then republicans have to loose half of their seats for involvement!and that they know.A Q alone doing all can be presented in BBC documentary and not in practical life with out knowledge of the world.When they are successfully location c130 in NKorea and they let him go? they let him go bythemselves as then soviets were prime.He is just a scapegoat. And Benazir had no moral obligations of interogating him since she had many cases against her and was back after US pressure and a deal via Levy Adrian.
3- She played at the hands of US just like Mush did. that led to her downfall!she wasnt the benazir of 1988 she was different!she knew it coming but as they say big things(chair) costs more led to her downfall.
4- military involvement cant be denied,any person right now in pak favoring USA is taken as a black sheep!will go d

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Agaya Raman!
by JonBonJovi on Dec 28, 2007 06:51 AM   Permalink
4- military involvement cant be denied,any person right now in pak favoring USA is taken as a black sheep!will go down and she did tht,she didnt learn from her fathers example the same USA led him down thru Zia ul Haq.
Jihadi outfits never were against a female PM,if they had been she wud have been dead in 1988,then talibans were more strong. Just keep this crap out.Dun just write fairy tales,write the truth what really got her down!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Agaya Raman!
by Vasanth Srinivas on Dec 28, 2007 07:12 AM   Permalink
Whatever you blabber here, let it be.
Everyone knows she started Taliban to separate Kashmir from India. She acted like she is the sole supporter of Democracy. What a joke...! Is POK running democratic government there...? Islam and Democracy are oxymoron. No one will support from heart the democracy for Islamic country. You need Sharia to rule.
Sharia ruled her now. No wonder she is killed. The job should have been finished on October 18. She escaped there.
She fooled the world in the name of Jihad. Finally, Jihad fooled her to death.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Agaya Raman!
by JonBonJovi on Dec 28, 2007 07:28 AM   Permalink
the same was the plight of secular Gandhi and Vasanth
Rajiv and Sanjay Gandhi so dun blabber something u dun know!just dont write anythign for the sake of ur nationalism!write opinions according to situation or just say i dunw ant reality!
Kashmir,just read about it from a neutral stand point ull get the indea and reading that read Junagadh and Hyderabad issues and correlate it to it!if u can!but u wont be!just dun bring ur nationalism in it just right and wrong!but i know u wont!
No Jihad fooled her,on contrary this word is been used for anything,she lost just becoz she sided with the devil who lead her to Pakistan and desserted her!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Agaya Raman!
by Vasanth Srinivas on Dec 28, 2007 07:43 AM   Permalink
Your scrap means nothing as your name.
You symbolize her more nearer to Mother Teresa. I wonder if she is any more nearer to that level.
Even if Kashmir belongs to Porkistan, any civilized human being will not take the path of Terrorism to take back the land. You tried to hit us 3 times in History and lost all of them. Regaining PoK is not an issue for us. Our "Secular" government cannot afford to do that for the sake of musalaman votes.
Let me come to the point. Let us assume that she was "not involved" in Kashmir issue. Where did she go after exile in Porkistan ? If she was clean, she should have stayed there as a true patriot. She was afraid that she might be put behind the bars. She ran for her life and came back barking "democracy" after Musharaff cleared all the cases against her.
Dont support her blindly as she is one wearing a burqua. Think before you type anything.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Agaya Raman!
by Meh on Dec 28, 2007 07:56 AM   Permalink
Vasanth...you need to grow and understand before writing crap. Abusing wont help.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Agaya Raman!
by Kiran K on Dec 28, 2007 11:10 AM   Permalink
I think India should support PPP to separate Sindh from pakistan and make a buffer state providing our army support.

Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Agaya Raman!
by Meh on Dec 28, 2007 07:54 AM   Permalink
I agree with JonBonJovi. But the real cause of problem in pakistan and india is actually not Al Qaida or taliban, but the pakistani army. they are high%uFFFDtrained and professional and decsiplined force and the reason is that Pak army is the Top career choice in pakistan for youngsters like it is IIT and IIM here. The pak army has the brightest and most talented cream of pakistan. They are the once who created taliban and ruled afghanistan afer defeating Sovites. they are heavily funded by US to the tune of billions of dollars.Taliban created Al Qaida and there are strong links bettween Army-Al Qaida and ISI, although not official one. No one in pakistan is capable of assassinating a big political figure without the help of the Army/ISI. The Army/ISI has been involved in all the politcal killing till dtae in pakistan either it is Zia ul haq (father of terrorism) or Bhutto senior or his two sons.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Anti-Bhutto army factions behind murder?