Re: Tata Nano project
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:26 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH 1 CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SME AT LEAST 30 PERSONS CAN BE EMPLOYED.WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COURT. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS[PUNE] AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN? REAL ESTATE? 7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B.GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS TO TATAS.
Re: Tata Nano project
by ramakant on Sep 03, 2008 08:54 PM Permalink
bongsa will gain more if Tata pays market price instead of forcing people to part with their land. Tata needs to take a long hard look at their ways of doing business. Why should the farmers be forced to sell land at lower prices. Tata should behave like good businessmen and not try to bribe local politicians to pressurize local people.
Re: Tata Nano project
by sn mukherjee on Sep 04, 2008 08:35 AM Permalink
tell me waht the price the tatas have paid. u are telling u were there when paid the money to the farmers.
Re: Re: Tata Nano project
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:27 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH 1 CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SME AT LEAST 30 PERSONS CAN BE EMPLOYED.WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COURT. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS[PUNE] AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN? REAL ESTATE? 7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B.GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS TO TATAS.
