The way Dilashan was given not out at a very crucial stage gives raise to suspicion that matches may be fixed. Even a kid can rule that one out, but the TV umpire declared it not out thus giving Delhi a very unfair advantage. More such decisions by not giving/giving LBWs, snicks etc can turn the matches around and favor the betting syndicates operating around the country.
Re: Dilshan's luck or match fixing?
by karthick vilvamani on Apr 27, 2009 08:39 AM Permalink
If u can see closely, u will come to know that boucher has hit the stumps before the ball reaches his hands
Re: Dilshan's luck or match fixing?
by Vaibhav Jain on Apr 27, 2009 01:07 PM Permalink
It was a fair decision. Mark Boucher has hit the stumps before the ball reaches his hands
