Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
  Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by anshuman on May 11, 2009 02:26 PM   Permalink
Actually, Sachin Tendulkar is SLUMDOG MILLIONAIR !!! Naturally, he is more hungry than others.
BEGGERS must have the right to earn more; evenif SURESH RAINA like players sitting outside.
BEGGERS ARE ALWAYS BEGGERS; & you are teaching the Sachin like begger regarding what to do & what not to do.
Afterall any cricketer is more than satisfied after playing cricket, but it seems that is not applicable to Sachin, because he had saved himself from playing for the nation. Players who played for nation always take the view to retire earlier to give chance to build the team in better manner. Otherwise, there is no any cricket team who will choose SURESH RAINA out of the playing squad.
Keeping logo on helmet of BCCI above INDIA's national flag indicates what are the attitudes of Sachin regarding nation, records, new players & his career as the batsman.
Ganguly labels INDIAN FLAG above BCCI logo. Remaining thing is about MAHARAJA GANGULY is that he is the most successful captain of India with 22 test victories & 94 ODIs victories. He also deserves to be 10th best CAPTAIN IN THE WORLD.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  Re: Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:
by vishwas rajadhyaksha on May 11, 2009 02:27 PM   Permalink
India lost 18 finals of onedayers under the captaincy of DADA & the cause is that sachin tendulkar & ajit agarkar both had not played in these 18 matches. In these matches Sachin has ducks or runs of single figure & ajit agarkar had not taken a single wicket & gave runs above 50 in 10 overs. There is politics played by Sachin even in world cup final also, by which SAURAVDADA can not hold trophy in hands. Actually, that finals are not 11 agaist 11, but 9 (INDIANS) against 13-others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Re: Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :
by Srivatsan Muthuswamy on May 11, 2009 02:57 PM   Permalink
Y cant Saurav play in finals?
It was Sachin who was the main reason that India played 2003 finals.
So Ganguly could have contributed atleast in finals....

So analyse the situation and speak.
It was in the first over , everything was decided. 15 runs of first over and they managaed to score 360.

360 then was considered to be unchasable target.
So Sachin had planned to hit everything , that was how he got out.

So the Bowlers spoiled the game.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Re: Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :
by Srivatsan Muthuswamy on May 11, 2009 02:57 PM   Permalink
Y cant Saurav play in finals?
It was Sachin who was the main reason that India played 2003 finals.
So Ganguly could have contributed atleast in finals....

So analyse the situation and speak.
It was in the first over , everything was decided. 15 runs of first over and they managaed to score 360.

360 then was considered to be unchasable target.
So Sachin had planned to hit everything , that was how he got out.

So the Bowlers spoiled the game.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :)
by pradeep das on May 11, 2009 04:19 PM   Permalink
it was agarkar's over if u remember..

Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://www.rediff.com/cricket/indian-premier-league-2009.html