Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Message deleted by moderator.    Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
  Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by Guest on Jun 08, 2009 06:04 PM   Permalink
you are shame of india beacuase sachin is legand of world cricket. if you unaware of that sehwag called sachin is god of cricket as well rickey ponting & yuvraj singh best cricketer is tendulkar. that is want to tell you dog tendulkar is not from your state that is why you said 'bhaiya''

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by amaresh sahu on May 29, 2009 12:48 AM   Permalink
Hey u dog do u know anything abt cricket u bloody looser. U must b hanged 2 use such harse word against GREAT MASTER BLASTER SACHIN RAMESH TENDULKAR.No one can fire him unless he said I QUIT. U know d reason , there is hardly any player at domestic level who can make him sit in d bench. Were u not jubilant when he scored that hundred & that master innings in Australia a year ago to win d match. or didnt u enjoy d match when Sachin guided India 2 victory against England chasing 360 odd runs in that test match last year? I feel sorry for u. U said Sachin was jealous of Sourav. How can he be, aperson who has never hit out against rivals sledging him or never complained against d wrong decisions he had, perhaps more than anybody else. And let me make 1 thing clear that Sachin & dada r two good friend .I t's people like u who create tension & misundersatndings among others. I doubt how u cope with ur friends or relatives. and why should he retire aslong as he scores. If u go through his records for last few yrs he is among the top 5 for India in both Tests & One dayers at a healthy average. So think twice bfore what u say u pig


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by anshuman on May 28, 2009 11:43 AM   Permalink
Actually, Sachin Tendulkar is SLUMDOG MILLIONAIR !!! Naturally, he is more hungry than others.
BEGGERS must have the right to earn more; evenif SURESH RAINA like players sitting outside.
BEGGERS ARE ALWAYS BEGGERS; & you are teaching the Sachin like begger regarding what to do & what not to do.
Afterall any cricketer is more than satisfied after playing cricket, but it seems that is not applicable to Sachin, because he had saved himself from playing for the nation. Players who played for nation always take the view to retire earlier to give chance to build the team in better manner. Otherwise, there is no any cricket team who will choose SURESH RAINA out of the playing squad.
Keeping logo on helmet of BCCI above INDIA's national flag indicates what are the attitudes of Sachin regarding nation, records, new players & his career as the batsman.
Ganguly labels INDIAN FLAG above BCCI logo. Remaining thing is about MAHARAJA GANGULY is that he is the most successful captain of India with 22 test victories & 94 ODIs victories. He also deserves to be 10th best CAPTAIN IN THE WORLD.




   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by amaresh sahu on May 29, 2009 01:01 AM   Permalink
Mr road side dog atleast for ur kind information , Sachin is not in this team due to his name, but due to his performance. And Suresh Raina is not a beggar. He will and he is getting his chances. And when a senior player like Sachin perfoms, u should raise ur game 2 that level to make ur place , & not on the bench marks of age. As long as Sachin performs well u have 2 earn ur place & not beg for it. And if u can collect d stats check what Sachin has done in the past few years. Sachin is not retiring means he is posing challenges 2 youngsters 2 raise their game, but all this is not ur cup of tea for a person who crtainly knows nothing abt ABC of cricket. But yes i agree 2 ur pont that Dada is one of d finest captains world has ever produced. So criticise 2 d limit, only where actually it applies

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by Anushree Gaikwad on May 28, 2009 11:46 AM   Permalink
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!
Sachin is brahman, so you are saying him the BEGGER !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by MANISHA on May 28, 2009 11:44 AM   Permalink
India lost 18 finals of onedayers under the captaincy of DADA & the cause is that sachin tendulkar & ajit agarkar both had not played in these 18 matches. In these matches Sachin has ducks or runs of single figure & ajit agarkar had not taken a single wicket & gave runs above 50 in 10 overs. There is politics played by Sachin even in world cup final also, by which SAURAVDADA can not hold trophy in hands. Actually, that finals are not 11 agaist 11, but 9 (INDIANS) against 13-others.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
  Re: Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by amaresh sahu on May 29, 2009 12:33 AM   Permalink
U must b crazy to say Sachin was selfish, & played polotics. What abt the knocks he played under Dada's cptaincy.I agree he was not a big match player, but what abt the performance in league matches? U r really a stupid , idiot fellow & u certainly know nothing abt cricket. By d way what can a batsman do when chasing a target of 359 in 50 overs. and what was dada's contribution in that innings u scondrel.U must b a freak to say like that. Go 2 d records and check who has won many matches single handedly during dada's captaincy? Dada himself didnt propel a great deal during his captaincy. It was a team effort and yes being successful was due 2 d fact that he could extract the best out of his team mates. But if u still say so then i can raise d qstn abt dada's performance under Sachin's captaincy. But i m not gonna do that for a hypocrate like u. Cause I respect both Sachin & dada a lot

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
  Re: Re: Re: LITTLE CHAMPION [ AGE:- MORE THAN 36 ] :) :(:(:(:(
by vipul ambhire on May 28, 2009 05:10 PM   Permalink
shutt your mouth

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://www.rediff.com/cricket/indian-premier-league-2009.html