The question to be asked is being part of andhra was detrimental to telengana? the answer should be a bing "No". Telengana did not develop since its leaders did no effort in the direction. Telengana didnt develop because of its own culture of spending(on boose and meat) rather than saving. These are the reasons for which separate 'andhra' was demanded earlier, but andhra was tied down with laggards. People moving to capital is predominant in any part of country/state. Likewise andhra people moved to telengana and contributed for the land and themselves. Seeing their effort and prosperity and the development, telengana leaders are now demanding for separate state for filling their coffers. People of telengana should kick their leaders butt and makesure they take up develoment measures in telengana.
