Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
There are three wrong points in this Article.
by Rohit on Jun 04, 2007 06:55 PM

The first one is saying Nair and Namboodthiri, both aare matriarchal, which is not the case. Namboothiri, the Kerala Brahmin follows Patriarchism.

The second one is saying Guruvayoorappan is an avatar of Lord Krishna. He is not considered as avtar of Krishna, but Krishna himself, more specifically Krishna as an infant.

And the third is Ravi saying the whole issue is because he is of backward caste Ezhava. The issue was his wife being Christian and Hindu Temples in Keral does'nt allow non hindus to enter temple premises.
So his son was not considered a Hindu because his mother was Christian.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'It is Brahminical arrogance'