Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
RE:RATAN TATA IS WRONG!
by SHUJAT MIRZA on Aug 26, 2008 06:06 PM

Dear Mr Kabeer,
Thanks for admiring the quality of land in question. I wonder why the people who have toiled on such a land for centuries are poor? They should have been super rich people. The owners of those stadia are doing favor to the nation, the future generation and the environment by not allowing multistoried office structure to be built in already conjested Mumbai. Instead if you flatten a few high rise buildings to make open play groung will be more apt.
Buying Mamta? C'mon there are fewer shorsighted, power hungry, oppurtunist, rhetorical and useless politicians available on the Indian political panorama than didi.
I am 100% sure that the farmers who will loose the land to nano will be most fortunate in the long run and neighbourhood farmers will be geelous of them.
Only thing is people have to be patient.
If the land of West Bengal is so fertile, bengal should be able to export quality grains to the world but only Punjab does so?
Farmers of Bengal is very poor compared to those of Punjab and Rajsthan?
Grow up and understand that you need investment and managment and back up by Industry to help even farming.
It was probably naive and highly optimistic on part of Tata to choose Bengal. Many states will be happy to host him.
India had lost L N Mittal to 70s beuracracy. Bengal is losing Tata to Mamta.
I am ready yo sell million Mamta to one Tata or Ambani.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
http://specials.rediff.com/money/2008/aug/26sli1.htm