In India, Democracy is nothing but a well staged drama of Democracy OF the Goons BY the goons and FOR the goons. (Goons of all types - Political, educated bureaucrats, Intelligent thinkers, Judiciary, Law enforcers and all looters). Democracy and politics and looting are synonymous. Genuine People will be crushed, forget allowing in politics.
The truth is that building lasting party structures takes time.There are many truths. An English translation of a French author book OF 18TH CENTUARY asked as follows."India boasts of a rich culture,heritage, learning,How could this country be ruled by the British who had NEITHER THE military might nor moral right.They ruled THIS COUNTRY by separatELy planted spring-syastem of administration.AS LONG as HE and HIS IMMEDIATE RELATIONS ARE NOT AFFECTED, NO INDIAN IS BOTHERED ABOUT THE SOCIETY.IN THIS COUNTRY THERE RUNS A PROVERB "WHAT IF RAMA RULES OR RAVANA RULES."IT WILL BE EVER TRUE. A FRIEND ONCE SAID THAT A JESUIT HAD SAID ONCE "INDIAN POVERTY CANNOT BE REMOVED."WE ARE SEEING NOW WHY HE MIGHT HAVE SAID SO.R.PONNAMBALAM
Of course, the government gets due credit for what it has done -- from the GST to bankruptcy and subsidy reform"AND TOTAL DISCREDIT FOR NOT HAVING A GRIP ON BLACK MONEY AND FOR WILLINGLY LET IT GO AS THE CONGRESS HAD DESIGNED IT DURING IT'S 30YRS OF MARKET THE ECONOMY(NOT MARKET ECONOMY), BANK LOOT DAYS.R.PONNAMBALAM
"Modi government had an opportunity in the wake of demonetisation to enact a simple, but potentially transformative change " for improving the wealth acquisition of 1.4 % national wealth with the bottom 30%people and reducing the wealth acquisition of 74% with the top 10%people (statistics as addressed by ex.V.P just around the time of demonetization in Lucknow quoting Credit Suisse) by ensuring that the black money that was said to be contributing to 43% or so of GDB was caught as Black money and then bydoing things to raise the per capita income of India which is now half that of Srilanka(Quora). >The following is from Chancel and Piketty's research report:’’ In 1930s Top 1% earners captured 21% of total income.Under Nehru’s policies the top 1%of people’s wealth stood at 6% income in early 1980s.After that ,shall it be called time of taking bath with rain coats on, the income share of India’s top 1% rose from approximately 6% in 1982 -1983 to above 10% a decade later and then to 15% in 2000 and further still around by 23% by 2014.”Something good for the ordinary man expected from the Modi Govt through demonetization..It went proved wrong. India remains a nation for the Rich.Going by results Nehru’s times had better wealth distribution.Now the govt. does no productive investing, relies on contract-commission industry and those with 74% have no enough to enjoy that wealth itself.The nation goes to---R.Pon
Who got independence in our country , the rich ,criminals,public looters characterless politicians can be included who are enjoying the independence. Not a common man we are ruled by these Rajas who don’t care for the moral . Our leaders change the colours and change the party to their advantage . It is high time we surrender our freedom and bring foreigner rule us at there will be some solace that intelligent people are ruling us
The people who call the shots in politics know for sure that common people are neither united to field their independent candidates nor do they vote independents who still contest and nor do they vote unitedly for NOTA....so bigwigs will continue to do as they please. Silenced Anna Hazare is the biggest example of failure of common people!!
Re: Politics and Aam Aadmi
by (View MyPage) on Sep 15, 2018 02:24 PM
This country had been giving loans in the tune of Rs.44000 crs. to select corporates.No one, not even our so called proletarian parties raised a single question in the parliament asking the justification for that in the so called socialist country and asking the number of people to whom the country is in a position to give such loans.Rajas, OK.But Mr. Modi was not a RAJA once.He should have had some good feeling for the poor people of the nation.He is expected to know what it means to be poor, unlike the Rajajs.He has dropped the catch willinglyR.Ponnambalam