All those patronized by congress will come to create all confusion, spreading hate among masses, and division of Hindu votes. Very high degree of indiscipline is shown by our judges, they are to be terminated, if there is any such rule. If judges want to go to people, let them all be selected by people only. Judicial system is not a Panchayat.
Questions top court judges raised need to be looked into: Rahul Gandhi • This is the first time four judges have raised such an issue • The points that have been raised by the 4 judges are extremely important. • They mentioned that there is a threat to democracy. It needs to be looked into carefully • Judge Loya's case must be investigated at the highest level of Supreme Court Is this not interference in the matter of SC disputes by a politician?
The comrades historically have reputation of being scoundrels of lowest order ( scoundrel according to Miriam Webster Dictionary is a disreputable person). COmmies killed more people than the number of people died in both world wars combined.
Commies are known for their cunning propaganda tactics and their ability change color as a chameleon. They are not very famous for holding up moral or ethical values.
And then they are joined by another disreputable political outfit known for it's family fiefdom - The congress. We have a toxic combo of disease of epidemic proportions.
These incidents happen like clock work and the above mentioned outfits almost declared that India is on the brink.
Looks as if it is in our grain to embrace most negative of views in society.
The whole controversy or conspiracy depending on your vantage, assumes that Justice Loya dies under mysterious circumstances.
The questions to be asked are Who said his death is mysterious and what is the affiliation of those who said it is mysterious. Could it just be natural death ( RIP) and a section of political establishment ( you know who) readily jumped up and said it is mysterious.
Could it just be that Justice Loya's death was natural and the fact that he was handling the case of Sohrabuddin encounter case was just a coincidence ? And Shah was made framed ?
Interestingly, D.RAJA ( commie) jumped first and went to meet the Judge Chalameswar at his RESIDENCE after this happened. Why no one questioning it ?
BJP is blamed for every thing - The scribe in Trpura Sudip Datta Bhowmik, Gowri Lankesh and Joya . And interestingly all these accusations come from 'Commies' and 'Congress' parties.
It at times sounds like COngress party and CPI have prior knowledge of these incidents.
This is to scuttle major cases in SC by the oppn through judges
by rajesh venkatraman (View MyPage) on Jan 13, 2018 10:00 AM | Hide replies
The so called senior judges have demeaned the office of the other 25 SC judges. If the CJI has allotted the cases to other judges in the SC, he knows that justice is delivered and why do these judges who are on the verge of retirement asking for cases which are on for more than 25yrs like reopening of the sikh riot cases, Ram janmabhoomi case and cases against the Congress leaders to them and not to other judges citing they are senior. does this mean that judgement will change if given to other SC judges who they call as junior and themselves senior. Contradicting statement of Mr. Chelemeshwar that CJI is one and first among them. So do other judges in the SC. How do they differ. Law is same for all and cannot be biased It can be understood that if the lower court gives a different view and higher court different view on the same case with same set of documents and witnesses. This means that the verdicts are different because the judges have a biased view on the case and not in accordance with the law When for the last 70yrs the system was same for promotions of judges and appointment in various courts. why is there a delay in appointing new judges where the vacancy is now at 6000 in other courts and 5-7 judges in SC. why don't they sort it out between themselves for filling it up with criteria or parameter changes as needed. the govt does not have any hand in the appointment of judges. Can one of the 4 judges take up the 2G case and reexamine them to punish the accused who
And komaaaaali Modi and gas Shah were working themselves into a frenzy of excitement !
The PILs challenging the faulty and poorly designed Aadhar linking with personal accounts were assigned by the CJI to an amenable judge of the govts choice, in violation of the Memorandum of Procedure for deciding the bench and bench strength for trying such cases !
The Justice Loya murder case was assigned by the CJI to a similarly amenable junior judge in violation of the Memorandum of Procedure for deciding the bench and bench strength for cases of such import !
For the komaaaali govt, several other equally frightful cases were coming up !
The CJI, going by what he has been doing for the past 2 years, could certainly have been trusted to similarly *handle* each of these cases !
But now........ all that excitement has been rudely interrupted by these 4 dirty judges !!
They have driven that tiny element of doubt into the komaaaaalis mind !!
Will the stuxpid north Indian voters, who could be normally trusted for being stuxpid enough to buy the lies, exaggerations and diversionary ploys of the komaaaali and fall for his shrill grating voice..........begin to sense that there is something seriously amiss ??
Re: The komaaaaali party (BJP)
by Vidyut Shenoy (View MyPage) on Jan 13, 2018 11:11 AM
Is dismantling organizations and systems the only option that CONgis and other opposition parties have to lodge a protest when things get uncomfortable for them? Shame on all you guys who support this most anti-national combine. The parties and judges may say anything, but it is clear that the CON led opposition is scared to bits with the turn of events.
The case which ignited SC judges' controversy
by NG Nileshwar (View MyPage) on Jan 13, 2018 09:19 AM | Hide replies
Law goes by precedent. This is the first offence and has therefore set a precedent. Merits apart, if this was to happen in the Army, court-martial was the only recourse. Of the 26 odd judges, only 4 offended. Hence there is no majority. The next major default was reclusion. If these 4 judges were not in agreement with the CJI, they should have reclused themselves in every case coming before them. This did not happen. Having the cake and eating it too. Better yet, they should have first resigned and then raised the issue. Then comes the issue of going public. The oath of secrecy was dispensed with by these 4 judges. The last straw was aligning to a political view. The judges had no business to entertain Raja. More so, Raja had no business to meet the judges. Raja further went to press and said that this issue would be raised in Parliament. The Collegium has been rendered sub-servient to the politician. How can any one now believe that the judiciary is independent? Till now it was so believed. Not any further. I, for one, cannot believe so. The last pillar of Democracy is shaking. Even if the issue is sorted out as claimed by the AG, the faith in judiciary is already shaken at the highest level. This had percolated to the lower ranks but not evidently not discernable. But now it is in open, thread bare. The same judiciary should not only be above law but seen to be above law. This is the tenet of law. Have they adhered to it? I leave this question open.
Re: The case which ignited SC judges' controversy
by balaji (View MyPage) on Jan 13, 2018 09:40 AM
Shows height of desperation of opposition parties. They are willing to compromise on National issues for petty gains Modi is running a BJP government with 90% Congress people in government machinery. He can't sack them all.
Dima caracy is under threat whenever the representatives of public get elected to offices by less than 50% votes, in elections where less than 70% of electorate has voted.... Whenever descendants of invaders, weaponists, supremacists and excluvisivists capture power by using, greed and fears as methods of arousing the electorate