why acting in fewer films makes an actors career fizzled out.hrithik has been doing fantastic roles and has been giving hits with talent.i would put him in the level of aamirkhan who also does very good roles but few films and he has a complete different style.calling an actor flop because he does fewer films but gives performances everytime is poor journalism.
In this interviewer opinion looks like only number of films count. Hrithik does less films and puts so much into it, wish all other actors are like that..esp. Akshay. Hrithik gives so much in his one film that others cant give in 5 films. And his career is rocking since KMG. everyone is waiting eagerly for Kites.
Re: Hrithik has most successful career since KMG.
by ASAD KHAN on May 05, 2010 08:00 PM
Its not that he is doing less movies but is offered less.
Do not forget the debacles he starred in. The success percentage of his movies is much less when seen overall. He was casted in too many movies after his first but most of them flopped.
Now criticism is on just coz the article by Syed Firdaus Ashraf and the comparison is with SRK, you may deny it but its a bitter fact for all of you.
Hrithik is a very taleted and hardworking actor but his luck coupled with doing any movie which came along, failed him.
Same goes with Amir, it was not intentional that he willing did only one movie, he was not offered moovies coz of his ego and the type of movies that used to be made in mid and later 90s. Slowly coz that media projected it so, he flowed with the tide.
Re: Re: Hrithik has most successful career since KMG.
by ramen das on May 05, 2010 09:44 PM
wow what an analysis...after so many flops if sallu can still get so many films u think these ppl were not offered films...after some wrong decisions these ppl hav wisened and no doing lesser films...if u note closely, even SRK is doing the same nowadays...i'm no fan of anyone of them...but hav 2 say tht the fist para of this article is misleading...