RE:RE:RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by Sandeep Gupta on Mar 22, 2007 02:25 PM Permalink
and if everone thinks in the same manner then we shud have a team of 26 ppl...one from each state..
RE:RE:RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by Sandeep Gupta on Mar 22, 2007 02:25 PM Permalink
and if everone thinks in the same manner then we shud have a team of 26 ppl...one from each state..
RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by Praveen Verma on Mar 22, 2007 02:08 PM Permalink
Ya i know...all the players should perform like Sehwag ;-) then only people will realize Ganguly's importance.
RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by agransh anand on Mar 22, 2007 02:09 PM Permalink
he has been the highest run getter fo india in this world cup...look at the stats b4 criticising someone..
RE:RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by chinmay kumar on Mar 22, 2007 02:13 PM Permalink
yeah is is scoring right.. but at a snails pace.. even against bermuda.. he needs to score them fast.. others are getting out cos they attempt to hit.. gagnully is too afraid to open up early and start hitting..
RE:RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by Sandeep Gupta on Mar 22, 2007 02:22 PM Permalink
ya if everyone plays like tht then we can give SL a target of 160-170 runs...look at his strike rate..huh
RE:Ganguly Should be out after 10 overs
by r venkataraman on Mar 22, 2007 02:10 PM Permalink
ganguly.... according to me, he has attitude issues! and he may have partial psych as well, that india should win under his captiancy not in anyothers. probably, that drove him to waste balls and drop catches intentionally. Its my guess, i may be wrong also!
RE:RE:Kick Agarkar...
by AboveAll on Mar 22, 2007 02:10 PM Permalink
Even if the plan fails, contributions by sreesanth / pathan would be better compared to Agarkar.
RE:RE:Kick Agarkar...
by r venkataraman on Mar 22, 2007 02:13 PM Permalink
BCCI [selectors and team mgmt] made mistakes at the last moment in grooming indian team for world cup. they spoiled pathan and did not give chances to the freshers for getting in to the groove properly.
RE:India-SL match may be fixed
by Rocky on Mar 22, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
even it may be fixed by ICC to avoid suffering from a big loss in world cup...
RE:RE:India-SL match may be fixed
by Nandakumaran Raman on Mar 22, 2007 02:08 PM Permalink
Very truly spoken ICC stands to lose a major chunk of its revenue otherwise
RE:India-SL match may be fixed
by joel on Mar 22, 2007 02:06 PM Permalink
Definately, our sponsorers will help the india team reach the second stage with the money power.
RE:India-SL match may be fixed
by Sanmesh on Mar 22, 2007 03:14 PM Permalink
ICC and BCCI both wants India to be in super8 so definitely they will fix the match..... othewise they may be in big financial loss...... So India will win tommarows game for sure...... not due to bating or bowling power but because of money power........ and pawar power
The problem with Indian team is they dont have Plan B. Just if some plan goes awry then shd pick -up other plan and execute. This is the comman sense management mantra not only used in Corporate circles but also by Australian Team. How many times we say theeir top order gone but some how, some one down the order clicks.
For example, we loose 4 quick wickets..we invariably tend to panic and lose the match. But the Coach shd execute his planB by doing some thing different...some thing like asking Rahul to play his test cricket and stick for more time. So we not only need hitters but also some one who can stick around.
RE:We need to be good in PlanB.
by Rajesh VG on Mar 22, 2007 02:11 PM Permalink
ya. absolutely. u need a game plan to win againt Sri Lanka. Sangakkara performs well against India in every match. Although Dravid is a wall in terms of batting, he is very poor in taking wise decisions on the field. He is a non-thinking captain.
RE:RE:worth less india cricket team
by Truth on Mar 22, 2007 02:07 PM Permalink
upsets are always in WC. Two kind of teams can win world cup. 1. who are consistent from starting of WC(Like Aus in 2003, SL in 1996) 2. First Struggled then come back in for(Pakistan in 1992, aus in 1999)
RE:RE:worth less india cricket team
by Debasis on Mar 22, 2007 02:10 PM Permalink
Y, i was looking a response. seems u love these shits a lot!! Keep up. But if you think is it worth to be in S-8 -> Semis -> Final, begging the chances from others ??
If India by chance beat Sri Lanka (to a great relief to the organizers) they won't make the last four or it should not as per their performance so far. In my opinion, the four semi finalists are: Aust, SA, NZ and SL and anyone can beat others on their day. Hope it will be a better final than last two WC.
Batting: Though considered to be one of the best line-up in the world, all depends on a good start, otherwise it will collapse like anything. Being Positive, Let us hope it does not colloapse.
Bowling: No attacking bowlers; considered to be the least favourites in terms of bowling. No positive thing possible...
Fielding: worst among the 12 participants. even bermudan fields look better.
All these do not make one to think positive! not even 50-50 chance.
however, if it makes to the next level, its great!
Guys pray for Bermuda to Beat Bangladesh anyhow & any cost,(Which is possible, if u have a doubdt for India) and don't worry about the result against Srilanka. say see u india in the next round. Cheers!
