RE:modi is great scoring man
by tt on Dec 13, 2007 03:42 PM Permalink
Exactly modi will with AK47 (147 Seats) the god is with true people. he always are speak true with confidence.
RE:modi is great scoring man
by ramesh julka on Dec 13, 2007 10:06 PM Permalink
you are totally right, Modi and Modi must win, he has the guts to lead not only Gujrat but India.so let us support Modi and defeat congress
It has become a habit of non congress parties to say congress has not done anything for past 50 years and they are doing everything in a very short span. It is a lie and fallacy. For centuries we were exploited by Mughals and Europeans. When we attained freedom, we had not resources to run the country. British government had produced brilliant clerks and nothing more. Government had to invest on Education, Industrialization, Agriculture and things like that. With all the limitations India has done well. Compare India with those countries that got freedom with India or little later, most of them have become bankrupt. The real change came with India developing indegenous technologies. All those were started with Mr. Nehru as Prime Minister. Rajiv Gandhi's era saw a major revolution in terms of telecommunication. All the road side phone booths were started by him. Later when Indian economy had almost collapsed, it was the then Finance Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh under Mr. P.V. Narasimha Rao who brought necessary changes to bring stability to Indian Economy. Later governments just followed what Dr. Manmohan Singh did. BJP which was always opposing foreign investments and always said swadeshi started falling in line with Liberal Economy and saw success. Mr. George Fernandes who was the opponent of Colas did not raise his voice agains t MNC's under NDA regime. What I say is everyone has contributed to the development of India. Indian missiles, tankers, and military ha
RE:Chronological fallacy
by amar preet on Dec 13, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
what congress? just take a birth in gandhi faimly & become king of india. People like u touching the foots of rahul & say jai-hind. manmohan singh is a working like a home-servant of sonia gandhi.she did'nt know how to wear a saree that's why she take the help of arjun singh,manmohan singh,kapil sibbal. u also admiring congress bcoz u also want to become a home servant of sonia gandhi.
RE:RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 03:47 PM Permalink
Similarly BJP is functioning like the slave of sangh parivar. It is ridiculous to know chief ministerial candidate or any other persons should be endorsed by sangh parivar. It is the mockery of democracy.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by Rajendra Deshpande on Dec 13, 2007 03:51 PM Permalink
My dear friend You havnot properly read my comments. Like you I also hate congress and Gandhi Family. You rightly said that some body with Gandhi name can become a prime minister. But at the same time I appreciate Dr. Manmohan Singh also. He is a " Right man surrounded by thief, Dacoit, Murder". Congressman will not allow him to work and will always pull his leg.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 04:04 PM Permalink
There is nothing wrong when someone from some family become prime minister or great leader. When Natwar Singh was a congress minister BJP tried to attack him (verbally) in parliament. When he was thrown out of congress, BJP tried its level best to woo him. Overnight a sinner became a saint. Similar thing with Sukh Ram. No political party is different in India. Ananth Kumar of BJP is named in HUDCO scam. Many BJP and non BJP legislators were involved, (even from Gujarat) were involved in human trafficing. There are good people in every party there are thugs in every party.
RE:RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 05:13 PM Permalink
u know who was home minister of state in gujarat during riots..check on web. BJP just try to remove natwar from congress and wants that he opened some facts of congress, but he was true congressi.. he kept silence of his own curruptoin as well other congressi leaders curruption
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 05:42 PM Permalink
But BJP wanted him in their party as soon as he was thrown out of the party. So also they wanted Sukh Ram after he was removed from congress. BJP is equally corrupt.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 06:21 PM Permalink
No they have nt tried to keep natwar in party. provide link to support this news in which any bjp leader ask...might be some biased media must be came into in ndtv reporter's mind
RE:Chronological fallacy
by Vismay on Dec 14, 2007 11:32 AM Permalink
Whoever may be the home minister, under a dictator like Modi all other offices are defunct.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 03:28 PM Permalink
Then why that effect is not coming is in following state where still congress or other party rules 1) West bengal, Orissa, NE states, Bihar, UP, Tamilnadu, Kerala...
Only states which are on progress routes are ruled by BJP in last 5-10 years. I am not biased but try to see the facts. Tell me any state which has done bad during BJP tenure. Answer is none
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 03:44 PM Permalink
Karnataka saw rapid progress during congress chief minister Mr. S.M. Krishna. Andhra Pradesh saw rapid development when Mr. Chandra Babu Naidu was the chief Minister. Kerala is not far behind. UP was ruled by BJP what did they do? Madhya Pradesh has not become a super state. Gujarat has developed not because of BJP but because of the people of Gujarat. Travel through out the world you will find it out. Where ever Gujaratis have gone they have progressed. They are very enterprising and self motivated. Orissa is ruled by NDA partner only. It is the total participation of people that takes a state forward and not a particular party or government. Governments will be catalysts. That is all.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 05:10 PM Permalink
Who told u karnataka got progrees, only one city banglore, made progress.. Andhra only hyderabad..And UP has made progress in the rule of kalyan singh.. he has also make rules strict against crime, copying during exams but they loose bcoz in UP muzzies % are more who loves crime, and hindus are not giving vote and not united. so mr kalyansingh lost. otherwise UP made goodprogress in that rule ask any body over there. Rajasthan and MP is doing quite goodd, check statstics..
RE:Chronological fallacy
by kashifa naqvi on Dec 14, 2007 01:50 PM Permalink
HELLO MR.KHUKHAR SHYAD AAP LOG BJP SE LINK HAI, THATS WHY U R TALKING WRONG MR. KALYAN SINGH KA JP PERIOD THA WOH SHYAD UP KA SAB SE BURA PERIOD THA, LIKE AS VIR BADHUR SING KA ZAMANE JAISE HI THA. UP ME NO DEVELOPMENT,NO PROGRESS,ONLY BAD POLITICS HAI ONLY, JO KUCH DEVELOPMENT THA WOH SHYAD BEFORE MANDAL COMMISSION HOCKUKA THA. USKE BAAD TO JO KUCH BHI HUWA HAI WOH SAAB KE SAMNE HAI. NOIDA KA DEVELOPMENT HORATH WOH BHI KALYAN SINGH KI HI RAAJ MAIN SAAB KHATAM HOGYA AUR SARA DEVELOPMENT SAAB GURGAON (HARYANA)MAIN HOGAY HAI. AGAR MERI BAAT PER BHAROSA NAHO TO PHIR HARYAN BJP SE ZARROR MALUM KARLO. BJP (BHARASHT JAN PARTY HAI YEHA DEVELOPMENT NHAI BHAI YEHA AAM HINDUSTANI LOGO MAIN COMMUNAL FEELING PAIDA KARKAR LADWANA JANTI HAI. AUR WAISE BHI ADVANI AUR ZEYAD TAR NETA PAKISTANI HAI(WOH BHI SIND SE) AB AAP KHUD SAMAJLO YAAR YEHA PAKISTAN SE AYYE HAI AAP AUR HUM PER RAAJ KAR RAHI HAI BHAI(AGAR SONIA GANDHI VEDESHI HAI TO PHIR ADVANI BHI VEDASHI HAI) AUR EK PAKISTANI HUM LOGO KO LADWARAHAI SAMJHO BAAT KO MERI BHAI. HAMARI TAQAT HAMARI EK JUKTA MAIN HAI NE KI APPAS MAIN LADNE SE HAI.AB CHAYA WOH KALYAN SINGH HO YEHA PHIR ADVANI INKA MATLAB SIRF HINDU AUR MUSLIM KO APAS ME LADWAN HAI. AUR KOI BHI RELIGON LADNE KI BAAT NAHI KART HAI. AAP KO ISLAM KE BARE MAIN KEYA MALUM HAI.AGAR KISE BHI RELIGON KO BURA BOLNA HAI TO PHIR PEHLAY USEK BARE MAIN STUDY KARO PHIR KOI BHI COMMENT KARO. I MEAN TO SAY STUDY HARD & THEN COMMENT KARO. I THINK U R BETTER UNDER STAND.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 05:56 PM Permalink
I have lived in Karnataka during SM Krishna's rule and I know what I mean. A decade rule of BJP in UP has not done anything great. Visit MP and see the jungle raj there. In Gujarat people themselves are enterprising. IN UK, US and other parts of the globe, people from Gujarat have excelled in all areas of life. They have lifted Gujarat to newer heights and it is not Modi or BJP. Even prior to BJP rule it was the most Industrialised state and well maintained state.
RE:Chronological fallacy
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 06:14 PM Permalink
decade in up,when alone BJP ruled? u r wrong... karnataka, y congress loose if he was doing good. Congress can never do good for any state. They are currupt. Check the wealth of any congressi before entering in politics and current u will be amazed. y gujarat has not progressed earlier, y in last 5-6 year, i live in gujarat, i know better then u, how much progress happened. I visited banlore also last to last year, where no infrastructure crumbled. travel 5 km from airport require an hour, in ahemdaad it require 1/4 of that, and i thnk population wiseboth are almost equal
RE:Chronological fallacy
by Rajendra Deshpande on Dec 13, 2007 03:29 PM Permalink
My dear friends, I feel Mr.Narendra Modi is the most eligible man to become Chief Minister of Gujarat, no... no Prime Minister of India. Look at the development he has done in Gujarat. Some people argue that it is due to the Dr. Manmohan Singh's policy, but his policies are for all the state of India then why only Gujarat is making progress. Take any issues, you will find a very clear and foresighted stand of Mr.Narendra Modi. Sardar Sarover, terrorism any issue, best leader to tackle is Mr.Narendra Modi. I am a Maharashtrian and living in West Bengal, therefore I may not be emotional about Gujarat election, but whenever the name of Mr.Narendra Modi is there I just get glued to the T.V or News paper. I really like the dynamism, decision making and shroudness of this person. Even his opposition parties like Left (CPM) they set the example of Gujarat and follow it as a Idol for them. It is not a joke. Buddhadeb Bhattacharji (CM-West Bengal) addressed to his party man in one of the meeting that West Bengal should set Gujarat as is its standerd. What else you want as certificate (so called) when your opponent are appriciating your progress that too in India? I hope India will get many more leaders like Narendra Modi but unfortunatly we don't have many more outstanding people in our society. They are always few, that is why they are great.
There should be total revamp of our political system. Politicians should me made more accountable. No political party in India can claim they are clean. People should vote for people with impeccable character rather than based on caste, religion, community and party. All the political parties at present have certain percentage of criminal elements. Hence no political party can say they are great. People should exhibit maturity and bring changes for the good of this nation.
RE:Time for change
by KhukharShikari on Dec 13, 2007 03:29 PM Permalink
yup first of all minority appeasment needs to be thrown out, people shdtalk like modi that 5 crore gujarati, no cast, no relligion
RE:Time for change
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 03:49 PM Permalink
If congress stands for minority appeasement BJP stands for majority appeasement. Both are no different.
RE:Time for change
by FAIYAZ BASHIR on Dec 13, 2007 11:28 AM Permalink
Dakshin You are correct in your expression .People of india should wake up & act wisely.
Problem of Islam is it has allowed itself to be governed by uneducated religious leaders, who think their way of interpreting their Holy Scripture is the best. There is no room for self evaluation self criticism etc. The so called educated and knowledgeable don't open their mouth because of the fear of fanatics. The educated Muslims should take a stand and throw out ill informed and hate spreading religious leaders. It is a general observation, when Muslims form a minority group in India or elsewhere in the they demand rights and freedom, which they definitely deserve. But in the countries where Muslims are a majority or a slight majority they try to oppress the freedom of religion and expression of all other religious faiths. This duplicity should be eradicated from within. Name one Islamic nation that allows the free religious practice of any other religion. This should change.
RE:Problem of Islam
by Manoj on Dec 13, 2007 11:00 AM Permalink
There is no mistake in interpreting Koran.
Koran clearly says: 1. Its the duty of real Mulsims to convert or kill all non-believers. 2. Its the duty of real Mulsims to take over the whole world for A11ah. 3. Its the duty of real Mulsims to keep women under purdah, uneducated, slave of men.
RE:Problem of Islam
by syed zaheer on Dec 13, 2007 12:04 PM Permalink
1)there r sum people who think knowledge and learning is useless, so they dont learn or study nything... 2) there r some ppl who r hungry and desperate to get to the "REALITY" so they do a deep research and study and learn everything and in the end they speak and make correct decisions... 3) there exists a group of ppl (in huge numbers) who only study or read few lines but they never finish the complete study of a particular thing and everything of their life is incomplete leaving thm with wrong solutions.... my dear friend if u r rilly so much interested in Quran and Islam thn y not put those 3 points of urz on some islamic scholar website ? maybe u r just afraid to hear or listen or read the truth and reality....anywayz, i think u forgot to read tht line of Quran where its metioned "they r deaf, dumb and blind......" and i guess u recognize who....GOD....only u can understand theze type (3) ppl....
RE:Problem of Islam
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 12:12 PM Permalink
Syed, People like you should come out in open and question the super authority of your religious leadership. If you believe in a God who will take care of everything you need not fight a war to save your religion. If it is God's religion He will save. He does not need fighting to propagate and protect a religion.
first try to understand what others are saying before blindly commenting. Will u question the super authorities of ur religion, leave alone religion, will u question ur bosses in ur office??? Religion, immaterial of which it may be, is a sacred and personal affair. Do you know wat Jihad means? Its people like u who have wrongly misinterpreted the most noble religion of the world, ISLAM.
RE:Problem of Islam
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 01:45 PM Permalink
If Islam is so peaceful why there is so much of violence even in Muslim land. Why there is no freedom of religion and choice is Islamic nations. Yes, I question when someone is wrong. If religion is such a personal affair why it is brought in public and fought. Teach your own folk Jihad means peace. Any super authority anywhere whether in religion of politics should be questioned, that is civilization not just blindly following whatever they say. Nobility should not just be in words or on paper it should be in action. There is no other religion that kills man in the name of religion than misrepresented ISLAM. People like you should prove to the world that it is noble.
BJP is a group of some extrimist who belive the old and outdated culture as Hindu culture where uppercast people exploited poor lower casts for years together with the threat of religion and god, zamindars and british chamchas who were established in British regim as instruments of the Britishers and got wealthy by exploiting poorer and the Traders who were looting the common people with non ethical values in trades. Gujrath they have made a laboratory for them and they are fooling the people of Gujrath as they are not Indians but Gujrathis, it is a big game of the rich to eat the poor, loot the poor and kill the poor. The simple reason is that the middle class is increasing very fast and it always attracted with the dream to become rich without efforts and become puppet of the rich class ! However Indians are wise enough and will not allow the opportunists who are putting buiscuits of promises of development and prosparity
RE:Gujrathi Aasmitha ?
by poosapati prabhakar on Dec 13, 2007 11:02 AM Permalink
Mr Bhonsle, First read and understand the real hstory of india not the passionated and then comment. The comment shows you are an illitrate of historical facts. If you feel you are an educated then be sure of what you say. dont write all the humbug as the communists and pseudo-secularists do.
RE:Gujrathi Aasmitha ?
by Jeet Demmelo on Dec 13, 2007 02:09 PM Permalink
Poosapati You do not want to hear what other people want to say. You are a person who would kill other person and if somebody will stop you, you will question him about his religion.
RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by mehtaraju on Dec 13, 2007 10:48 AM Permalink
A very well researched piece of information. I sincerely hop that it is factually correct. I did not know so much. All that I knew was these people have ,since time immemorial fought against christians(crusade), jews in the middle east, against innocent helpless hindus for over a 1000 years, they have butchered people in the name of their religion. Wherever they are, there is terrorism-from Australia in the east to west asia to USA in the west. And they are they are the ones who are suffering!!! The best thing is, when these people dont find Hindus to kill(as in India), they start fighting against each other!!!(shia-sunni conflicts in pak,iran,iraq). When not even that, they start whipping themselves in public(muharram). perhaps these people love the sight of blood spill on the streets)
RE:RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by kashifa naqvi on Dec 14, 2007 01:59 PM Permalink
MR.RAJU
PLS.READ GEETA & UNDERSTAND THE MESSAGE OF GEET SHRI KRISHANA NE KHUD ARJU KO KEYA MESSAGE DEYA HAI.(YAADA YAADA HI DHARAMASYA MAA BHALASHO TADDACHANYA BHAUTTHI BHARATYA ABUDHDANAM HI DHARAMASYA MABHALASHU TADDACHAYA)KUCH YAAD HAI YEHA PHIR NAHI.
RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by poosapati prabhakar on Dec 13, 2007 11:04 AM Permalink
A spade is a spade no one can change the reality. well done.
RE:RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by Subash Shukla on Dec 13, 2007 01:41 PM Permalink
People like Dakshin do not know the Hindu ethos. Hindus never attacked any country not even when there were no Muslims (before Prophet Mohamed)or Christians (before Jesus Christ). Hindus are peace loving people. Only Parsis are better than Hindus. Second thing is that Hindus have survived and grown under the Mughals and other barbaric Islamic rulers. It is "Sanatan" dharm i.e. religion for eternity and cannot be destroyed by Christians/Muslims etc. Buddhism started from India but Buddhists are very few in India.
AFter the 1st phase of polling in Gujarat is over suddenly there is a spurt in bloggers favoring Congress and opposing BJP
RE:RE:RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 01:59 PM Permalink
Subash I am not talking anything about Hinduism right here. I have not made any comment against Hinduism or any other religion. If you have gone through my previous post you will understand what I am trying to say. I am an a political person. I am not supporting congress nor BJP. What I am just saying is misuse of official machinary by Modi is wrong as also, by the government in Kalinganagar Orissa, or Left government in Nandigram or Congress supported anti-sikh violence. Violence by any one in any shape cannot be appreciated and glorified.
RE:RE:RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by ajay jain on Dec 13, 2007 04:37 PM Permalink
Hindus never attacked any country but there are some who kill muslims for hindu votes.
RE:RE:RE:RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 05:44 PM Permalink
This is exactly what I am saying. India is a great civilization. It does not need Sangh Parivar to protect it. It has an inbuilt capacity to protect itself.
RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 11:44 AM Permalink
Thank you for that information on Islamic brutality. The present fear is Hinduism will become like that under Modi under the impact of Sangh Parivaar, (not under BJP as a whole but with certain elements within).
RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by dakshin on Dec 13, 2007 01:53 PM Permalink
Islamic brutalities are well documented and it is seen everywhere and anywhere. Any religion that does not admit its mistake and looks forward to progress is a de generative religion. There is no freedom of expression and choice is Islamic countries. Education, media and everything is controlled by religious authority and you call that excellent and Indian way of free democracy a false propaganda. Name one Islamic nation where media is free and can air anything they like. Then you make comment.
RE:RE:HISTORY OF JIHAD (ISLAMIC CRIMANLITY)
by ajay jain on Dec 13, 2007 04:35 PM Permalink
Modi's brutalities are not documented as yet ,does it mean that he is not brutal?
BJP is the biggest fraud and has duped its own votebank namely hindus.BJP had given 3 main promises.Ram Temple,Removal of 370B in J&K and Common Civil Code.It delivered NONE.Did not do PRACTICALLY ANYTHING for the hindus and on top of that BJP has gone one step ahead of Cong and other parties when it comes to appeasing or licking the ass of minorities. So why should Hindus vote BJP??? Can anyone give one SINGLE good reason why???
RE:why should Hindus vote BJP???
by Rahul Gupta on Dec 13, 2007 08:37 AM Permalink
Tathagat Mukherjee... I dont blame anything but your overall ignorance of Indian Political system. For your kind information...Political party and the Government are two separate entity.To delver these poll promise you have to bring BJP to power and not NDA which is an amalgamation of parties who have political compulsion to be with BJP and not necessarily agree to BJP policies. If you are so concerned of all these things not happening please bring BJP to power. They will happen
RE:RE:why should Hindus vote BJP???
by ajay jain on Dec 13, 2007 04:39 PM Permalink
They should have rejected the power if they knew that they will not be able to implement their basic agenda.This is fraud ?
RE:why should Hindus vote BJP???
by Vismay on Dec 14, 2007 11:34 AM Permalink
Mr. Jain I agree with you. When BJP is in power it talks of political compulsions and adjustments. When they are in opposition they just shout.
Not only that, these BJP guys were hell bent on selling the family silver to buy chocolates. They wanted to sell all Public Sector giants to Ambanis and Tatas and Birlas.Trying to sell the profit making PSU Oil Companies is the BIGGEST AND UNPARDONABLE crime M/s.Shourie,Vajpayee & Advani Inc. were about to do when the nation stopped them.BJP turned out to be worse than Congress when it came to corruption.And what irritates more is that they always talk high-headedly and proclaim to be the CLEANEST party. All bullshit.Its time Hindus show BJP that they have seen their dirty linens and no longer need them. Whether Gujarat or elsewhere. BJP will fall NOT because of Muslims or Congress. It will fall because it has back-stabbed its own constituency namely-Hindus.
RE:Why Hindus Should Vote for BJP??
by Rahul Gupta on Dec 13, 2007 08:51 AM Permalink
Tathagath Mukherjee.. It seems you stay in West Bengal and a supporter of medieval Party called CPM. WB: where there are nothing called Industry. They dont believe in Private - Public co-operation in Industry. Their entire political Business runs just because of the ignorance, poverty and political dogmatism of the people of WB. Otherwise 30 years of CPM rule and No Industrilization, look at the Roads, unused electricity ( just because no industrilization), poverty and all civic vices. Only after Budhddev coming in WB they realized 30 years of foolish opposition to Capitalization did not help. Tried to set up Industry in Nandigram... goofed it up royally.. Look at Gujarat Mr Tathagath... SEZs galore at Mundra, Jamnagar, Ahmedabad, Pipapav, kandla and many more in the way. Look at the road conditions. Sky scrappers, cleanliness...be my guest at Gujarat and see for yourself.. BTW I am also Bengali and left WB 20 years ago.
RE:Why Hindus Should Vote for BJP??
by mehtaraju on Dec 13, 2007 09:54 AM Permalink
arey rahul, he is not a bengali brahmin, he is some mullah, some sayyed or laden or something!!! why argue with him. they dont believe in development, they only believe in sharia.
Hi , Keep your hand on your heart , close your eyes , consentrate your mind than only you decide is modi nor right ? i am neither in favour of modi nor against him. but we need to look into the situation and reality. I am not from gujarat. I lived in BIHAR. I have seen BJP and congress both in power. I am working in Gujarat. I think Modi is a clean image man, except Godhra riots . He is one of the most honest politicians in india have today. I am not against Muslim community at all. As this land belongs to Muslims they way it belong to Hindu's. But coz of few anti indian elements islam gets some bad name in the country and as well in the world. What we have heard of the riots is only from the media and congress which is not 100% right. The development in Gujarat in the last few years is fantastic. He is a good administrator, this even the media agrees. The living standard of common people in gujarat is much better than all the other states in India. Don`t vote for Modi jee if you think he is a hindu and hinduism can only surivive if he is there. AS Hinduism in itself is well capable of surviving. Pls vote for Modi only on the issue of the development and coz him only Gujarat is no.1 state in India today. The Other local BJP leaders doesnt like him coz he is not letting them make money. He growing fast and prooving himself to be the best CM gujarat. Comparision, of modi jee with other leaders of all parties , you will find the modi is the best.
RE:Modi jee
by Jeet Demmelo on Dec 13, 2007 02:17 PM Permalink
It is not because of Modi there is development, but the development process was started by our PM when he was FM and before that by our first PM.
..... Congress has not much to show for all the years at the Center and it has lost many states to regional powers. Workers from his own party are opposing him because they are not receiving the kickbacks that they had expected.
Indian goverments and civilian offices have become corrupt and lazy. Congress has governed India and most states for majority of the time and when and ehere they do not rule...Congress is the main opposition. Congress has failed doing its job when governing and providing credibility and watchdog responsibilites when in the opposition.
Today Gujarat is the safest state and that is thanks to Modi. Pakistani Islami terrorists operate in India and Congress has done thing effective to stem this menace. We know that in Gujarat whether there is excess use of the law or not something is done and terrorists do what they want and run ...and not sit and watch the aftermath. Following the Godhra riots, the state has seen the best peace between Muslims and Hindu ....maybe it is because Muslims are scared of Modi ...but then so are Hindus, who are not attacking Muslims.
The state election is a Gujarati issue and must be settled by Gujaratis and not the Congi's from Delhi. Every argument leads to Modi as being the best for Gujarat. Even if we say he is not the best ...there is no one better and until such time that Congress provides a good alternative Modi should remain
