RE:Advani better keep his foul mouth shut
by Pappu on Mar 25, 2008 04:48 PM Permalink
which school do you ???? pls don't your childer in that school too
RE:Advani better keep his foul mouth shut
by bandu bondu on Mar 25, 2008 04:43 PM Permalink
U people must agree that NEHRU was a greedy person. For Dynasty he divided INDIA into TWO. We dont think that INDIA is a secular country. Insted of Support MUSLIm and OBC by education they did them HANDICAPPED>
If a baggers get 300rs perday without do anything, no baggers will want to do some jobs. Indian COng made us that way.
RE:Advani better keep his foul mouth shut
by pradip choudhury on Mar 25, 2008 05:01 PM Permalink
Please dont tell us about nehru's policies..for him only we are facing all types of problem in this era ok... if u want example.. kashmir issue...is this true "At least he faced British lathis and torture"
RE:Advani better keep his foul mouth shut
by tichkule bhaskar on Mar 25, 2008 04:59 PM Permalink
Friend from where you got this information that Neharu faced british lathis and torture. Please which book you refer because i would like to know about it.
RE:RE:Advani better keep his foul mouth shut
by Aranmula on Mar 25, 2008 05:14 PM Permalink
Nehru is dead and gone. That was an era where much information was not available as today. If you have grown up reading history books edited by govts as they change I cannot help it.
But...That is not the case today. With the amount of information avilable at our disposal... people need to take informed decisions. How many are doing?
Dont postmorten Nehru. He is gone. you ask Advani what he has done?
RE:RE:Only if Motilal Nehru had been impotent....
by Sahadevan KK on Mar 25, 2008 05:02 PM Permalink
* Longest pm-in-waiting in the world.
*A terrorist organisation which serves bermuda instead of khakhi goes to guinness book.
*AKG bhavan attack was well-planned like babri masjid demolition. but the terrorists could not succeed to kill the whole leaders and demolish akg bhavan.
*Advani makes programme to remove Nehru ji from history as succeeded to remove Gandhi ji.
* His new book is a burden for his party as well as entire country.
* Supreme Court again slapped BJP on post Godhra militancy.
RE:Only if Motilal Nehru had been impotent....
by bandu bondu on Mar 25, 2008 04:42 PM Permalink
U people must agree that NEHRU was a greedy person. For Dynasty he divided INDIA into TWO. We dont think that INDIA is a secular country. Insted of Support MUSLIm and OBC by education they did them HANDICAPPED>
If a baggers get 300rs perday without do anything, no baggers will want to do some jobs. Indian COng made us that way.
RE:Only if Motilal Nehru had been impotent....
by sri kanth on Mar 25, 2008 05:01 PM Permalink
even same thing applies to nehru as well..at least we could have get rid off emergency and sonia mania...
Pt Nehru -- Socialism Romanticism, totally democratic Indiraji-- Tough socialism but autocratic Rajiv-- Could not take firm decisions or stand by it for long Narsigha Rao-- Survivor Made unethical compromises. Devegoda---- Good for nothing Vajpayee-- Democratic and accomdative Manmohan-- Decisions compelled by political compulsions. Too mild to stand up against his masters
RE:RE:The nature of PM decides character of that GOVT
by TOOLS BANGALORE on Mar 25, 2008 04:59 PM Permalink
Every morning MAnmohan Sing asks Sonia "Madam Ji... Aaj pagadi kis colour ki pehnu?"
RE:HI This is Sunil Sriniwas. Request all south Indian guys (Tamil madrasis, Mallou Keralites, Gult Telugus, kannadigas) who post messages in this forum to use grammatically correct english.
by Pappu on Mar 25, 2008 04:45 PM Permalink
yes people should use these word also
busya, lefta, kaal me back, while speaking should not say like "i was there naa" should i write more ??
RE:HI This is Sunil Sriniwas. Request all south Indian guys (Tamil madrasis, Mallou Keralites, Gult Telugus, kannadigas) who post messages in this forum to use grammatically correct english.
by sah on Mar 25, 2008 04:43 PM Permalink
Correct u r Name first
RE:RE:HI This is Sunil Sriniwas. Request all south Indian guys (Tamil madrasis, Mallou Keralites, Gult Telugus, kannadigas) who post messages in this forum to use grammatically correct english.
by suraj john on Mar 25, 2008 05:09 PM Permalink
may be we should all start speaking like biharis like sunil suggested
RE:3 Cheers for Advani
by Sahadevan KK on Mar 25, 2008 04:49 PM Permalink
* Longest pm-in-waiting in the world.
*A terrorist organisation which serves bermuda instead of khakhi goes to guinness book.
*AKG bhavan attack was well-planned like babri masjid demolition. but the terrorists could not succeed to kill the whole leaders and demolish akg bhavan.
*Advani makes programme to remove Nehru ji from history as succeeded to remove Gandhi ji.
* His new book is a burden for his party as well as entire country.
* Supreme Court again slapped BJP on post Godhra militancy.
Hey, editor, there is one HUGE MISTAKE in the last paragragh. It said "Advani adds that he had urged Chinese Prime Minister Hu Jintao". No, the Chinese Prime Minister is Wen Jiabao and Hu Jintao is the Chinese President.
RE:Advanti Ko Chetavani
by SLVP on Mar 25, 2008 04:43 PM Permalink
aap kaun pradesh se ho mere bhai. You can certainly disagree on any point of view of Mr Advani. But plz write in getleman's language.
1. He said about Aksai Chin, "Not a single blade of grass grows there, what shall we do with that land?" Dont readers think, any person saying this should be hanged by neck till death.
2. He hide the information from 1954 to 1959 that China is building road through Aksai Chin. Do you need any bigger traitor?
3. He was much less efficiant than Jinnah and Subhash, played all dirty tricks against them and had illicit relationship with lady mountbatten. If Patel was not here, this country would have finished long a go.
4. He never cared about pakistani and indian refugees. The present refugee problem would never have arised if he could follow Patels tricks.
5. He had no vision, he created india unprotected to China, he ensured worse industry policy, did not allow nuclear research, created north-east problem by not developing them for logic that they will fight for freedom if developed, he allowed marxist historians to write indian history so that peoples voice pronounced. He ensured hindi to dominate india, hindi belt control india. A truely insecured crook headed brain child of Mahatma.
6. He used national emotion of freedom fighting for his election. This is the greatest mistake committed by his selfish brain. There is no evidence of his love for kids, but nehru day is ...
7. China never liked india, never liked any other country in the world, see their policy against japan, korea, burma. Do not believe chainese, they lied to us for 50 years. No more.
RE:Nehru was greatest traitor of humanity
by raj on Mar 25, 2008 04:40 PM Permalink
chinese should not be trusted even now. but we have comrade friends in the our current government! why need enemies when we have friends like karat, brinda, nad other jokers ?
RE:Nehru was greatest traitor of humanity
by suraj john on Mar 25, 2008 05:11 PM Permalink
Well said mate. i feel exactly the same way about that man who died of 3rd stage syphilis which for the ignorant is a sexually transmitted disease.Will spit on his tomb if I ever happen to be there.
RE:Nehru was greatest traitor of humanity
by Krishnan on Mar 25, 2008 04:41 PM Permalink
every man has his faults. we should learn from them and not repeat them. there is no point cursing nehru. your kind of messages are utter rubbish.
RE:Nehru was greatest traitor of humanity
by S R Ganguli on Mar 25, 2008 04:51 PM Permalink
This post might well add: Nehru unilaterally withdrew Indian soldiers from J&K when they were driving out the intruders from Kashmir. Nehru also wanted Gen JN Chowdhury to stop the Goa operation. But the General overruled Nehru and conquerred Goa. Nehru was pro-communist and was naive in running the Statecraft.
RE:Nehru was greatest traitor of humanity
by sukumar basu on Mar 25, 2008 05:21 PM Permalink
Mahatma Gandhi and Pt. Nehru are being projected as if they only brought freedom and made India what it is today. No doubt they had certain contributions to the freedom struggle and subsequent adoptation of mixed economy. But their certain actions left some permanent damages for which India will suffer for generations to come. Gandhiji's decision to undertake fasting on the eve of Independence Day to stop riots and mass repartition of Hindus and Muslim between India and Pakistan. If that mass exchange between two countries were allowed, that would have been the last fight between two communities and both countries could have lived peacefully afterwards. About Nehruji, he left two gangarins on Indians- Kashmir and Tibet. By stoping the first war with Pakistan in 1948 over Kashmir halfway, he made us to feed that state at the cost of other poor states and at the same time made them to bleed us for years after years. His action of illegal recognisation of Tibet as an Intregral part of china, is like, cutting a canel to bring corocodile near your door.
RE:these politicians should be shot in broad daylight
by intelligent on Mar 25, 2008 04:42 PM Permalink
I agree with you, Afzal guru tried but went unsuccess
Ever since my return from Ahmedabad and after the cabinet meeting the same day which I had to attend at practically fifteen minutes' notice and for which I regret I was not able to read all the papers, I have been anxiously thinking over the problem of Tibet and I thought I should share with you what is passing through my mind. I have carefully gone through the correspondence between the External Affairs Ministry and our Ambassador in Peking and through him the Chinese Government. I have tried to peruse this correspondence as favourably to our Ambassador and the Chinese Government as possible, but I regret to say that neither of them comes out well as a result of this study. The Chinese Government has tried to delude us by professions of peaceful intention.My own feeling is that at a crucial period they managed to instill into our Ambassador a false sense of confidence in their so-called desire to settle the Tibetan problem by peaceful means. There can be no doubt that during the period covered by this correspondence the Chinese must have been concentrating for an onslaught on Tibet. The final action of the Chinese, in my judgement, is little short of perfidy.The tragedy of it is that the Tibetans put faith in us; they chose to be guided by us; and we have been unable to get them out of the meshes of Chinese diplomacy or Chinese malevolence. From the latest position, it appears that we shall not be able to rescue the Dalai Lama.
RE:Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel's letter to Jawaharlal Nehru
by intelligent on Mar 25, 2008 04:46 PM Permalink
Mail me some body is making my comment to you as abuse.
