RE:congress will win...vokkaliga consolidation towards it
by ashutosh doshi on Apr 30, 2008 02:09 PM Permalink
The power enhances the arrogance of BJP and they behave like having a clear mandate even while in a coalition of 16 parties. They all are loudmouth, away from ground realities and through an through communal. During their 6 year rule, they brought the country to the brink of collapse, wanted to be seen talking big On TV, spilt country vertically, damaged the secualr fabric of the country and make so big coruuption that a brother killed brother for the money. Let us kick BJP out of power everywhere
RE:congress will win...vokkaliga consolidation towards it
by TIGER MAN on Apr 30, 2008 09:42 PM Permalink
ashutosh doshi...WHO BROUGHT INDIA TO THE BRINK OF COLLAPSE ....YOUR CONGRESS TWARP RAJIV GANDI...
RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by ashutosh doshi on Apr 30, 2008 02:11 PM Permalink
Abhinav, you seem be from Medivial age, from Isalamic times, that is why you cant see beyond Islam for all the ills. Fools like you only get carried away by the fluency of HIndi by BJP.
Consider this : The power enhances the arrogance of BJP and they behave like having a clear mandate even while in a coalition of 16 parties. They all are loudmouth, away from ground realities and through an through communal. During their 6 year rule, they brought the country to the brink of collapse, wanted to be seen talking big On TV, spilt country vertically, damaged the secualr fabric of the country and make so big coruuption that a brother killed brother for the money. Let us kick BJP out of power everywhere
RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by srivatsa yb on Apr 30, 2008 01:31 PM Permalink
u are a fool...we kannadigas are not morons like gujarathis to vote for a useless leader like yediurappa...
RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by ashutosh doshi on Apr 30, 2008 02:22 PM Permalink
Abhinav, you are 20 years behind. Congres ( I) does not exist. It is accepted fact the it is INDIAN NATIONAL congress, unlike BJP which has nothing to do aam janata. Advani is muslim hater because he had to leave pakistan at the time of partition. BJP is brahmin centric party and all important positions are held by hight people. want a proof consider how these BC / OBC leaders were treated 1. Waghela 2. Kalyansingh 3. Gopinath Mundhe 4. Uma Bharati and the list would be endless. BJP working against secular India and against " equal rights for all" Just check their controlling Working Committee you would know what BJP is.
RE:RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by bullseye on Apr 30, 2008 02:49 PM Permalink
ashutosh doshi,you are not having this name but a christian missionary staff or jihad who has no love for national interest.congress contribution to india- caste politics,conversion agenda, corruption,no development,allowing multinational s to operate in india,surrender to america and minority appeasement,marginalising majority people. bjp is far better compared to congress.
RE:RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:27 PM Permalink
Instead of abusing You should thank to IBN-CNN channel for helping BJP.
RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by bullseye on Apr 30, 2008 02:42 PM Permalink
it is true that any poll predictions in favour of congress will think undecided,apolitical people come out to vote bjp.thanks for cbn-ibn to help bjp indirectly as it has happened before in tamilnadu and gujarat.
RE:The Congress I - (I standing for islamic) is due for remation in India.....
by Bhaarat on Apr 30, 2008 01:42 PM Permalink
that is what I did & you did not like it
Are English News Channels Biased towards Congress? Lies, Lies, More Lies
by Pop Head on Apr 30, 2008 01:18 PM Permalink | Hide replies
How reliable are opinion polls? Psephology is a science and therefore subject to also errors at times.
The biggest goof-up including NDTV had been the 2004 Lok Sabha polls where most polls indicated a clear win for the NDA. NDTV gave NDA 230-250 seats to UPA's 190-205.
RE:Are English News Channels Biased towards Congress? Lies, Lies, More Lies
by ashutosh doshi on Apr 30, 2008 02:14 PM Permalink
In fact the channels that predict a certain party win, help the opposition where their vote consoliates. Let us at least believe the larger integrity of Print Media compared to " Time Slot " hungry TV media
RE:Are English News Channels Biased towards Congress? Lies, Lies, More Lies
by jagar singh on Apr 30, 2008 05:18 PM Permalink
in fact,NDTV was the closest to actual results.
RE:Are English News Channels Biased towards Congress? Lies, Lies, More Lies
by PAL on Apr 30, 2008 02:40 PM Permalink
You are right allenglish channels are run by christians hence promote only congress.
ontrary to BJP and its supporters insinuations that IBN-live got Gujurat wrong, the naked fact is that the channel was spot on. This can be verified by refering to their past predictions published in both print media or internet. The Times of India published IBN-live Gujurat exit polls giving - BJP 92-100 Congress 77-85
Misgivings if any was that their survey failed to project the real magnitude of BJP's win in Gujurat. An analysis of all past opinion polls show that this is more a reflection of methodological failure to convert votes into seat shares.
Opinion polls are accurate pointing the direction the wind blows but seems unable to capture the magnitude of impact of voter's mood precisely in terms of seats. In Gujurat (a 10% vote lead) this led the BJP to get more than their predicted seat share. The Congress in Karnataka holds a 10% vote lead and accordingly on the way to a much larger victory than predicted by IBN-live.
RE:RE:Lies, Lies, Lies
by srivatsa yb on Apr 30, 2008 01:33 PM Permalink
ya agreed....most ppl in this forum simply shout at the top of their voices in support of the BJP...cnn-ibn got the trend right in gujarat
RE:Lies, Lies, Lies
by P ASHOK on Apr 30, 2008 04:14 PM Permalink
how are telling the cnn ibn is right in Gujrath case as it was clearly wrong,still ur supporting cnn ibn ,I think ur employee of that challan
RE:Lies, Lies, Lies
by jagar singh on Apr 30, 2008 05:21 PM Permalink
many of us get carried by sentiment rather than facts.i believe the dissatisfied JD(S) voter will go to congress.if they wanted bjp,they would have voted in 2004 itself.
If Karnataka rather than a Gateway for BJP into South India was to be their Graveyard then.....
by Pop Head on Apr 30, 2008 01:11 PM Permalink | Hide replies
he Deccan-Herald pre-poll survey that BJP is not only a Lingayat party but that too confined to Mumbai-Karnataka region, where they are expected to sweep. This is the region where Lingayats concentrate in high numbers.
The Congress is main challenger to the BJP in this region. Consequently if all non-Lingayats in that region consolidate their voting around Congress than BJP will be practically wiped out from Karnataka competing with minor parties like SP, JD(U), BSP for third place.
RE:If Karnataka rather than a Gateway for BJP into South India was to be their Graveyard then.....
by jagar singh on Apr 30, 2008 05:23 PM Permalink
even bsp may cut both ways,harming congress and bjp(late thrust on brahmins)
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:12 PM Permalink
Shame on you people you could start your own channel in last 60 years. Instead of finding who is who better you start your own channel or start reading KAMAL SANDESH & PANCHJANYA.
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by chakradhar gopal on Apr 30, 2008 01:17 PM Permalink
jitendra working on cogress pay sacale / or fond of licking sonias rotten a** :))
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:23 PM Permalink
Rediff helps people to take out their frustration.Get well soon.
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by chakradhar gopal on Apr 30, 2008 01:27 PM Permalink
wish u same jitendra ... now go and get ur prize from sonia .. is is ready with her a** :))
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:29 PM Permalink
Continue it will really help you to get relief.
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Bhaarat on Apr 30, 2008 01:38 PM Permalink
Sir,Can you explainthe fact that everything that is right is credited to madame and all that goes wrong is because of other parties and also because of the naive public according to our dear pm and the chaploosi congi leaders who go to unlimited extent to please the dynasty. Mind you I am not a BJP supporter.But SYCOPHANCY is staring on your face
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:47 PM Permalink
I do not care for her at all but useless lady was brought to center of attraction by BJP once they started foreigner campaign. Instead of bringing peoples need & problems in front of government BJP chose to personal attack on her and made her popular. It is BJP and people like you who see her hand in everything. Just ignoring her will solve most of the problem of BJP.
RE:RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:25 PM Permalink
Abusing others is your parsonal agenda or BJP's
RE:RE:RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by chakradhar gopal on Apr 30, 2008 01:31 PM Permalink
we are learning it from congr'ass' ....
RE:RE:RE:RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:36 PM Permalink
Nobody will allow you to abuse & shout , not even your own family member but rediff allows you to do so. Just say thank you rediff.
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Bhaarat on Apr 30, 2008 01:30 PM Permalink
People thought one does not require a channel for people to know the achievements of the govt.They should be able to see & experience that everyday in their living world.But alas!the cong. does not think that way.They require TV to tell people.And it is they who are forcing others to put up channels on party-lines.Sad it is.
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:33 PM Permalink
Chakram Gopal read what Mr. Bhaaarat is saying that channels are not required but you are busy in finding the numbers of channels and their master.
RE:RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Bhaarat on Apr 30, 2008 01:40 PM Permalink
jitu, read properIsay channels are required now.
RE:RE:RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:49 PM Permalink
What were you doing for last 60 years?
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by srivatsa yb on Apr 30, 2008 01:34 PM Permalink
hmmm so MrGopal all other ppl are wrong and only the BJP backing dailes are right is it...u moron
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by chakradhar gopal on Apr 30, 2008 01:09 PM Permalink
.... cotnd.
G) INDIAN EXPRESS:DIVDED INTO TWO GROUPS. THE INDIAN EXPRESS & NEW INDIAN EXPRESS (SOUTHERN EDITION). Acts Ministries has major stake in the Indian express and latter is still with the Indian counterpart
H) EENADU:
Still to date controlled by an Indian named Ramoji Rao
I) Andhra Jyothi :
The MUSLIM PARTY OF HYDERABAD known as (MIM) along with a Congress Minister Has purchased this Telgu daily very recently.
j) The Statesman:
It is controlled by Communist Party of India
k) Kairali TV:
It is Controlled by Communist party of India (Marxist)
l) Mathrabhoomi:
leaders of Muslim league and Communist Leaders have major investment.
L) Asian Age & Deccan Chronicle:
Is owned by a Saudi Arabian Company with its chief Editor M.J.AKBAR.
RE:Which Media is controlled by whom and how does it derive benefit
by bhanu prakash seethiraju on Apr 30, 2008 01:53 PM Permalink
Andhra Jyothi in the hands of TDP not in congress minister
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by Jitendra Kumar on Apr 30, 2008 01:08 PM Permalink
Where were we 60 years back check the facts. Instead of wasting your precious time here better you campaign for Yeduriyappa in karnatka. That will help him and you will have some satisfaction.
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by Pop Head on Apr 30, 2008 01:09 PM Permalink
That's make it one vote for Yediruppa which together with his own vote, presumably for himself, will add to two confirmed votes.
Small start. Even if it cannot starve off certain defeat, can avoid the ignomity of losing his deposit
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by srivatsa yb on Apr 30, 2008 01:34 PM Permalink
u are a fool...we kannadigas are not morons like gujarathis to vote for a useless leader like yediurappa...
A govt just for minority appeasement brought the rule of quota based on caste and creed! Not based on the economic status of the citizen!.Not based on his educational fundamentals!!!! is that the better performance???
A terrorist punished for death sentence for master minding the attack on highest civil body in the world,The INDIAN PARLIAMENT is still enjoying his vaccation in jail!!!!.What about the indian citizens,the policmen died in the attack????? Where is the justice happened??? Is it because of the better Governance???
If you sincerely want our country to emerge as a major player in the democratic new world order, it must shy away from perpetuating DYNASTIES as an answer to government, while prompting on full accountability from its politicians and bureaucrats.
Can you say loudly ....Respect democratic norms rather than lionizing DYNASTY RULE OF GANDHI FAMILY??????
Haven't we got enough intellectual people in India other than this DYNASTY???? Don't forget there are many sincere people who grown up from the very grass root level in thier political career.
Alas.... these days shamelessly they are perpetuating Rahul Gandhi to be the PM.A colonial drama is underway behind the scene by Sonia to promote her son!!!. Are we still so idiots to accept a choclate boy as our PM, who just came out of his mom's lap and just showing off his readymade agendas by touring here and there?????? (CONTND.....)
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by srivatsa yb on Apr 30, 2008 01:35 PM Permalink
hey ranjith u are just an idiot writing crap haha
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by ashutosh doshi on Apr 30, 2008 02:16 PM Permalink
A doctor son can become doctor, engr's son engr. Tata's son, industrialist, and reliance owning half the industry. Renjit, you are blind politically. you are writing crap what BJP likes to promote
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by jagar singh on Apr 30, 2008 05:30 PM Permalink
constitution does not provide for economic criteria for backwardness.renjith will now want to scrap it also.dynasty is promoted by people.unless they vote,where are you in democracy?
I have a few questions to raise here in this forum.
How can you say the performance is better when the elected UPA Govt. is toying with the tax payers money??? a wopping 15 billion USD is allocated for Loan waiver!.From where it comes??
How come the situation got so worst for the farmers???? Why haven't they done anything to motivate the agriculture from the beginning itself???? instead they wanted to lure the farmers just before the assemebly elections by giving so much soaps!!!!! How many farmers have suicided even after declaring the waiver???
Is this waiver a productive solution for the fundamental problems of farmers in the coming future??????
Where is the food stocks which were piled up during Vajpayee Govt.??? Why don't you have food stock left???
Remember the congress got more than 50 years to rule India and what got in return was the division among society.appeasement and appeasement all the way!!!!!!!. are we so fools to carry on????
Creating social injustice by declaring huge incentives for the so called minority is the better performance by a Government????
For the sake of vote bank politics creating division among society is the better Governance???
If you are a proficient econimist with pluralistic view how will you define the rich and poor????
How will you define the critieria for admission to higher educations? (CONTND.....)
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by dhananjay maktedar on Apr 30, 2008 01:43 PM Permalink
election scenario in karnataka is going on caste based which is a dangarous indication none of the party has come up with a manifesto which gives a clear indication of thier future plan for overall development taking care of it,inflation,agri,farmer suicide, indutry, infrastructure
RE:RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by Bhaarat on Apr 30, 2008 01:46 PM Permalink
Mr.Dhananjay some parties have come out openl with rheir manifesto & also the cm candidate.
RE:WHAT IT MEAN BY BETTER GOVERNANCE! (CONTND.....)
by Bhaarat on Apr 30, 2008 01:44 PM Permalink
mr. srivats & mr,jitendra will reply to your queries.