Besides all the crap that goes out here, my simple question to you all is 'why are Hindus afraid of implementing reports from a Hindu Judge (mind you)?'. Do you think he has any biased against any Hindus? If not than what is wrong in implementing the comissions findings. Why Not? If this was something to do with Muslims than there would be special courts and special laws targetting the poor and innocent muslims but when it comes to your own door, you turn your face away. Who is being hypocrite here? Hindus or Muslims. Had the commissions recommendations (many of them) were implemented so far, Muslims of India would be examplry to the world. All those who comes to these chat dis-boards has no minds or come here with a biased and hatred against Muslim. I think somewhere someplace in the recent history 'sanity was buried along side the truth'... No one wants to look at history and learn from it. Muslims ruled this country for more than 400 yrs with love and affection and gave it a new life. Yes, a few handful might be debatable but the rest are commendable for giving India a new civilization to India.
RE:RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:05 PM Permalink
SC wants marriages registered, Muslim board objects ( By IBNlive.com ) New Delhi: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has objected to the Supreme Court%u2019s order asking all states and union territories to introduce legislation within three months to make registration of marriage compulsory in all communities.
A bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat on Thursday asked governments to file a compliance report and an affidavit after the deadline. The court passed the order after noting that several states had made registration of marriage compulsory only for Hindus.
Khalid Rashid, member of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said the judgment interferes with his community%u2019s personal law. Rashid told CNN-IBN that the community keeps record of weddings and the Supreme Court order was %u201Cunwanted hindrance%u201D.
"Marriages in Islam are a religious affair completely. If registration is made compulsory it will bring unwanted hindrances in the solemnization of nikaahs (marriage), so our request to the court and governments is it should be made voluntary and not compulsory. We ourselves keep records of all marriages at our institutions and we don't think there is any need to compulsory registration, which will bring problems, particularly in villages," he said.
Kamal Farooqi, another member of the Muslim board, said the court's order was not against Islam but wanted certain conditions for its implementation. "The authorities must recognise our qazis and th
RE:RE:RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:06 PM Permalink
Parsis and Christians have laws in place to register marriages in their communities. Under the Indian Christian Marriages Act, 1872, entries are made in the marriage register of the church, soon after the ceremony, along with the signatures of the bridegroom, the bride, the officiating priest and witnesses. The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 makes registration necessary in the community.
Under Section VII of the Hindu Marriage Act 1954 has a provision for registration of marriages but it%u2019s left to the couple to either solemnize the marriage before the sub-registrar or register it after wedding.
However, the Hindu Marriage Act says the validity of the marriage will in no way be affected by omission to make the entry in the register. Therefore only under the Hindu Personal Law it is not compulsory to register the marriage.
In Muslim law, a marriage is regarded as a civil contract and the qazi (officiating priest) records the terms of the marriage in a nikahnama, which is handed over to the married couple. "A MOCERY OF SUPREMCOURT DECISION N CONTITUTION OF INDIA BY MUSLIMS"
RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:06 PM Permalink
Is this enuf to prove muslim mentality?? u guys want a seperate law for urself in HINDUSTAN"
RE:RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by Billy on Oct 25, 2007 09:56 PM Permalink
SURESH - I did not know that Sri Krishna was a Muslim name. ZINAWAR - I am not sure how your posts are related to mine but let me explain you about Personal Law. Muslim Personal Law Personal Law is a law concerning an individual person and the persons closely related to him, e.g. laws relating to marriage, divorce, inheritance, etc. It includes laws which are mutually agreed upon by a group of people. This law does not include any crime or an act that will harm the society directly. In any country, the Personal Law may differ for different groups of people and for different communities. Since India is a secular and democratic country it allows different groups of people to follow their own personal law if they wish. As an example let me clarify further: We Muslims would prefer that in India the Islamic Criminal Law be implemented on all the Indians, since, chopping the hands of a thief will surely reduce the rate of robbery in India. Similarly, 80 lashes for giving false testimony will prevent a person from giving false witness.
As I mentioned in my first post Sanity and Truth are no more relevant in todays' intellectual (so you may call) conversation. Here is a proof from the above responses I got.
RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 10:14 PM Permalink
billy: dekh ise: To Muslims May the Truth Set You Free http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_Islams_Terrorist_Dogma_in_Muhammads_Own_Words.Islam APNE AANKHE KHOL RE
RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by Billy on Oct 25, 2007 10:45 PM Permalink
Zinawar - If you like to hear about Islam and Muslims read it and hear from the right source. If you like to hear about World War II hear from everyone else but Nazis but I think you prefer the other way. This shows me your mentality.
RE:if Hindus can't believe Hindus verdict than Why Blame Muslisms
by Billy on Oct 25, 2007 11:28 PM Permalink
ZINAWAR - ZINA (RAPE) WAR - Shows your mentality. What can I expect from morons like you. This is a common problem I have where I end up talking to people with no BRAIN. When you are out of answers here comes the reply... eat pork, Leave India, Go Away Muslims... ah* what a bunch of lunatics and hypocrites you all are...
The CBI, probing the death mystery of Rizwanur Rehman, may be still trying to establish if it was a case of murder or suicide, but one man %u2014 a mortician %u2014 still stands firm in his claim that the 30-year-old graphics designer was murdered.
Dilavar Hussain, the mortician, who had cleaned Rizwanur's body before his burial, says he is convinced that it was a case of murd
RE:Man who cleaned Rizwan's body claims it's a murder ( AND U HAVE TO BELIEVE HIM< BECOZ THIS STATEMENT IS FROM A MUSLIM BROTHER)
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Oct 25, 2007 08:57 PM Permalink
Ask him to appear before Judicial commission and CBI.
RE:Man who cleaned Rizwan's body claims it's a murder ( AND U HAVE TO BELIEVE HIM< BECOZ THIS STATEMENT IS FROM A MUSLIM BROTHER)
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:01 PM Permalink
Check this link: http://kenlydell.typepad.com/islamic_evil/
RE:RE:Man who cleaned Rizwan's body claims it's a murder ( AND U HAVE TO BELIEVE HIM< BECOZ THIS STATEMENT IS FROM A MUSLIM BROTHER)
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:03 PM Permalink
The Violent Oppresion of Women in Islam, has been banned by YouTube. follow this link: http://www.frontpagemag.com/
RE:Man who cleaned Rizwan's body claims it's a murder ( AND U HAVE TO BELIEVE HIM< BECOZ THIS STATEMENT IS FROM A MUSLIM BROTHER)
by Billy on Oct 25, 2007 10:12 PM Permalink
ZINAWAR - Read my response to Suresh above. When a HINDU judge Hon. Sri.Krishna gave his recommendation on his finding you said he you don't believe him. Now you be a judge here. What kind of a mentality a Hindu has. Can I call it a secular mind, a hindu mind or ARE YOU LOST? I am sure there are far better ones than you out there who I call more sensible Hindus and more sane minded people.
RE:Very Sad! Very Sad!
by shayantan on Oct 25, 2007 08:58 PM Permalink
ABEY SARDAR TEREY KYA BARAH BAJ GAYE? YOU TOTALLY DIDN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CAPTION MEANT, EITHER THAT OR ELSE YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ENGLISH
RE:RE:china
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:16 PM Permalink
China is home to a large population of adherents of Islam. According to the CIA World Factbook, about 1%-2% of the total population in China are Muslims,[12] while the US Department of State's International Religious Freedom Report shows that Muslims constitute about 1.5% of the Chinese population.[13] The various censuses asserted that there may be up to 20 million Muslims in China.[14)
RE:RE:RE:china
by zinawar on Oct 25, 2007 09:17 PM Permalink
Briefly during the Cultural Revolution, Chinese Muslims were not allowed to attend the Hajj,and only did so through Pakistan,
