RE:Why Devdasam Board in a Secular COuntry?
by Surya on Jun 04, 2007 11:00 PM Permalink
sanjay choudhry
I dont side any invaders. I just dont side loosers who pose as owners of land which they lost in battle and calim it by benevolence of the person who won it. n now cry that its his land.
RE:Why Devdasam Board in a Secular COuntry?
by Humanvalue on Jun 04, 2007 10:53 PM Permalink
Suyra ... What did you just eat? The stuff that came out of your other end. All Christians in the coutry don't have any self respect. They worship their foreign masters for the sake of money.
RE:Why Devdasam Board in a Secular COuntry?
by Sameer Bhagwat on Jun 04, 2007 10:58 PM Permalink
sanjay choudhary, humanvalue and my table spoon have 1 thing in common. all three of them have same intelligence level
RE:RE:Why Devdasam Board in a Secular COuntry?
by on Jun 04, 2007 11:13 PM Permalink
whatever sanjay had said about surya above proves to be perfectly correct.
As usual Hindu%u2019s are again facing attack of pseudo secular forces. And hindus%u2019s beloved mandir has once again become the target of of secular controversy. here the anger is misplaced, and derives not from a sense of dharma violated, but from embarrassment at what others will think and say about believing Hindus. This is nothing but a hangover of the inferiority complex instilled in Hindus during the colonial period when Christian missionaries unleashed a barrage of propaganda against the tradition, in their quest for converts.
To understand the issue in its proper perspective, we must understand the difference between the Hindu mandir and monotheistic houses of worship. The mandir is literally god%u2019s palace; it is built according to shastric specifications, and once the images are consecrated it means the gods have accepted the invitation to reside in the respective temples. This is what gave temples their power and sanctity in all ancient traditions.
In monotheistic traditions, the synagogue, church and mosque are houses of congregation where the respective gods are remembered in community worship. But monotheistic gods do not descend from their heavenly abodes to dwell with the believers, even during the hour of worship. This is an important distinction, because the congregation itself has no special sanctity, and can meet anywhere. Hindu tradition, on the other hand, shares divinity with the believers, because man is made of the same atman as Parambrahman. Hindus
Create a dispute , divide the people! Then missionaries will come to allure and baptise! After all! the target of converting India's prople by 2010, is at door steps! We know, THE CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG! So Ravi , Maria! calm down!
RE:Ravi's efforts to please Sonia!
by RR Rajaram on Jun 04, 2007 10:42 PM Permalink
Christens are attacking hindu traditions, shrines in slient but planned and affirmative way. The new coin of Indian Rs. 2 has done away with the map of India and there is a CROSS instead of the India map. Wake up Hindusthan before it late.
RE:Ravi's efforts to please Sonia!
by RR Rajaram on Jun 04, 2007 10:41 PM Permalink
traditions, shrines in slient but affermative way. The new coin of Indian Rs. 2 has done away with the map of India and there is a CROSS instead of the India map. Wake up Hindusthan before it late.
Ravi is clearly trying to divert the issue in to Casteism to gain milaege. The cleaning ceremony was done not becuz Ravi is a Ezhava, but becuz Ravi is married to a Chritian.
Well, that doesnt really substatiate the cliam of Tantris....No shashtra says if a non hindu enters temple thn the temple become impure..
True that Non Hindus have no business in temple, if they dont have Bhakthi; but any one with true devotion to Guruvayoorappan shd be allowed in..The Lord will be happy to see those who have devotion in him.
From what Ravi says, it seems he has real devotion and the temple administration shd not have made a politics in this issue..
RE:Kerala
by Harsha K on Jun 04, 2007 10:39 PM Permalink
I suppose there is a blood test somewhere that can show if one is devoted or not??
Being a brahmin, I have always felt that, the only mistake the brahmins ever made was to segragate themselves in the name of caste. That has brought them to a sorry pass, where they are the ones who are discriminated against in almost all fields.
What is the point of stopping anyone from entering a public place? It will only lead to the feeling that it is the brahmins who perpetuate a caste system, when it was invariably the ruling class who enforced the caste system (never the brahmins).
I believe any place of worship (hindu or otherwise) should be open to anyone as long as they show due respect and reverence to the place. It doesn't matter if they are believers or non-believers.
Ravi has no right to say -"its Brahminical arrogance".it seems he is meaning that brahmins are generally arrogant.i condem it .just bcoz brahmins dont say are dont speak much politically,he cannot speak liek this.can he speak like this about any other case.he would be thrown out.just bcoz we are tolerant does not mean he can speak anything.Hari
everybody must be allowed into the temple.in Gita, Lord Krishna tells -a pure pandita sees every brahmana,cow ,dog,dog-eater(outcaste) as spirit soul.so a pure pandita never makes distinction between different castes
THE ACTUAL TRUTH IS NOT THE CASTE.IT IS BECAUSE THE RESPECTED VAYALARGI'S WIFE IS A CHRISTIAN,FOR CONSIDERING THE CASTE AND RELIGION,THE UPPER CASTE HINDUS WILL ALWAYS CONSIDER THE CASTE AND RELIGION OF A PERSON'S MOTHER,THIS IS BECAUSE MANY UPPER CASTE HINDUS HAVE CHILDREN IN LOW CASTE PEOPLE LIKE SC/ST/OBC WOMEN'S.SO IF THEY ARE FORCED TO CONSIDER ONE'S RELIGION OR CASTE ACCORDING TO THEIR FATHER'S RELIGION AND CASTE THEN IN OUR SOCIETY MANY SC/ST AND OBC PEOPLE WILL BE PROMOTED TO UPPER CASTE.THE VERY INTELLIGENT AND CUNNING UPPER CASTE PEOPLE WILL NEVER EVER ALLOW THIS.EVERY ONE SHOULD DISCUSS THIS HISTORICAL TRUTH, THE MOST BITTER TRUTH THE UPPER CASTE DISLIKE.
RE:THE TRUTH
by JKP on Jun 04, 2007 10:39 PM Permalink
Nair, you have many from that "Sambandham"(meaning prostitution in reality) and you fools consider it as pride. Am I right?
RE:Casteism in Christianity
by BannedMike Jordan on Jun 04, 2007 10:25 PM Permalink
There is no caste system in Christianity. It exists only in your perverted mind.
RE:Casteism in Christianity
by Santosh on Jun 04, 2007 10:43 PM Permalink
MIke
You are living in a make believe world. there are ten thousand sects in christianity, protestans, catholics, syrian christians, what not. ask a catholic to marrya protestant and there wil be dissent. also converted dalits are treated with disdain. So dont tell what you do not know. Know your facts Mike before you speak.
RE:Casteism in Christianity
by ManLion on Jun 04, 2007 10:37 PM Permalink
Dear Mike, I can assure you that there are christians who do mention about their ancestry. In Konakans different surnamees can be traced to their original ancestry such as Prabhus, Shenoy, etc. We have a friend who said that her grandmother asked whether her husband was a bomman (brahmin)Cristian?
The devasom board , which manages these temples is constituted of the most corrupt ass*es from the Hindu community. This board is manned again on caste lines. These are the people who decide who is pure and impure. Ironical ..huh...
