Congress mentioned in their manifesto that they will remove poverty. How? That mean they will prosper government in other word will make life good for people. The same way modi has put the same in other words you give me lotus (BJP government) I will give Laxmi ( Wealth ) in term of prosper governance.
Congress mentioning in there promises Rs 2 Kg rise , TV , Golden Chain to poor family girl etct %u2026in TN and other states , what it is ,
In this country what ever BJP does it is wrong and what other parties does it is right. Please open your eyes and evaluate on every stapes and not on one ?
RE:RE:what wrong ?
by vintesh saxena on Dec 11, 2007 10:02 AM Permalink
yes dear u r right.......even congress is deviding hindu and muslims by giving reservation to muslims in IAS/IPS/IFS exam.......i dont know what congress want india in 2020 if he suppose reservation such big administrative service rather should be given free primery education/facility to these people to improve the situation on ground lable........
RE:what wrong ?
by madhur varshney on Dec 12, 2007 12:45 PM Permalink
If Congress said so they must be prosecuted for making a promise of looting the tax payers
RE:Rediculus Complaint by Congress. Shame up on you
by vintesh saxena on Dec 11, 2007 10:05 AM Permalink
dear these fulish cong leader ......they think public is fool but they don't know we know everything....we have seen natak in karnataka....now singhvi took U turn on his statment.........hahahaha
RE:Congress has lost the election even before it started.
by zafar arif on Dec 11, 2007 10:03 AM Permalink
Congress has not lost its credibility, respectability nationally and globally. On the other hand, the so called Modi is begging to go to us & Uk but he is denied permission, think about his image globally for a minute. You will surely arrive at answer as to who has lost and who has won !!!!!!
RE:RE:Congress has lost the election even before it started.
by ROHIT Ahluwalia on Dec 11, 2007 10:10 AM Permalink
inspite of the fact he was not allowed to go still no one can deny the fact that he has mad Gujarat the richest state and looking at other CMs who make those visits every yearly what have they achieved? he achieved so much when he was not even allowed to go emagine what he would have done if was allowed forget globally think logically sometimes its good to open eyes and see whats in front than go about looking at a distant picture as for congress on a national or even on global level what has it achieved ??????? nothing cant get the nuclear deal go through, haven't got any new policy only banking on previous BJP govt's initiatives thats when we have 2 finance ministers (Manmohan sing is a finance minister after all) so congres' 2 finance minister not even good as BJP's 1 ......................think about it
RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by Venu gopal on Dec 11, 2007 09:56 AM Permalink
The only impotent religious people in the world is Hindus.They have no idea about there tradition and culture .After 60 years they are still beliving in Colonial sponserd Congress thinking.That is why India is still UNDER DEVOLOPED after 60 yearas!Going behind foreignrs as their leaders...
RE:RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 11, 2007 09:55 AM Permalink
nehi! she is worse than that:)- She is a psuedo-secular 'eminent' historian:)-
RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by Mohammed Zameer on Dec 11, 2007 09:56 AM Permalink
mr. david 1st of u all u r christain not a hindu, so dont play a card to divide between hindu-muslim.
Anyways if all the temples are destroyed by mughal emperor then i think thr will be no temples remained in the India at presents and if Aurangzeb is cruel leader then i think india must have maximum populaton of muslims rathar then hindu, but the fact is that, british the christain has invade india and taken all the wealths, liquid cash and resources from india and made us leave like slaves in thr 300 years rule, see if u see the history of mughals, i don't think indian peoples specially hindus has made to live like slaves in their rule.
So plz dont passed any hatred message, 1st read the history then passed ur comments.
RE:RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by Venu gopal on Dec 11, 2007 10:03 AM Permalink
When you need Hindu support you are talking and fooling the poor Hindus.The British never did that much than the crual Mughals did.What we can see in Delhi?The monuments,tombs all built over the debris of Hindu culture and tradition.Can your people forgive ,if this sort things happend in a Muslin majority country?What happend to Bhamini hills?
RE:RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by s h on Dec 11, 2007 10:08 AM Permalink
Mohammed,
Look into your Zameer and think. Save and except sourthern part of TN and part Kerala, which some how did not get ravaged by Muslims, every where else, in india you wlll see Temples and Temple cities in ruins. See in ANDHRA and Karnataka. Vijayanagar (Hampi), Badamai, Halebidu, Belur. List is endless,. Even the secular govt of india has written in information at Kutubminar that Kutub destryoed 100s of nearby temples and used the stones to build Minar. And how all these muslims managed to rule you must be wondering. You can learn about that from present day seculars and more particularly the congress sycophants who lick he feet of that Italian. Short signted goals, greed and ENEMY'S ENEMY IS FRIEND. jAICHAD for example.
RE:RE:RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by Mohammed Zameer on Dec 11, 2007 10:29 AM Permalink
so i though hindus are more intelligent then us, i feel very sorry to hindus who are leaving their religion, some have accept buddism, jainism, muslims, christains etc. etc.
But this is happening now not in the mughal emperor rules, british who fools us and taken all the wealth and resources and make us leave like slaves, for them you dont have any hatred because they are not muslims.
In kerala and TN, christains are giving money to poor dalits hindus to convert them in their religion, but ur eyes is not open, but muslims are not doing that.
I dont think so in recent 100 years is thr any temples or church has been attacked but yes our babri masjid has been demolished but ur eyes is not opened.
I feel realy sorry for my hindu friends who mostly nastik sorry if I hurt any body sentiments.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by madhur varshney on Dec 12, 2007 12:59 PM Permalink
I choose not to say your religion say about the subject.
Hinduism is a religion that allows a person to accept it or leave it voluntarily please never again make the mistake of confusing this strentgh of us as a weakness.
we have been respecting the religions of others and the concept of regious tolerance stems out from our religion and not from those you speak of and besides Buddism and Jainism are not very different from what we are despite what Congress and/or affiliates profess
RE:RE:Barbarism on Hinduism by Muslims:
by Praveen Gupta on Dec 11, 2007 10:36 AM Permalink
The creation of Sikhism by Guru Gobind Singh Ji was solely because of Aurengzeb. Guru Ji and SivaJi in Maharastra fought with tyrants of Mughal Empire. The reason Hinduism is still there is because of its eternity and its inseparability from human. It does not kill because you are not following its sayings. Hindu respect all and everyone. Any aspect of hate you have seeing in Media is 99% reactionary i.e. to say that Muslims created the problem. And anyone who is born has birth right to self defence.
Denying Aurenzeb as non-CRUEL is denying the existance of Guru Govind Singh Ji or Shiva Ji.
RE:To COngress, Muslim reservation is secular! But even uttering Lakshmi is ''Comminal'' :)-
by zafar arif on Dec 11, 2007 09:58 AM Permalink
Only congress is the political party in the national level, which has brough respect to our Mother land-India, not only on national level but also globally. Secondly, for low beginniers and creeping political parties like BJP, which is breeding on the communcal politics, and are not governed by any ethics or morals, they feel it is wrong to say that they are the perpetrators of crimes against humanity as they killed countless innocent muslims, which is a fact. It is wrong to say that, but not wrong to do such heinous acts ! If such parties come into power, India will be drag into dark ages; thanks the people of india in other states [other than Gujrat] are not so blind and illiterate dunces to bring again such demons to power! It can happen only in morally bankrupt state like gujrat.
Mahatma Gandhi wanted the Congress to be disbanded so that this political outfit should not take undue advantage of the sacrifices of millions of Indians for National freedom. Instead of respecting his instruction, Congress went on to seek and benefit the sympathy votes over the killing of Mahatma. This kept congress in the power for many decades.
The next trade was over the killing of Indira Gandhi and subsequent massacre of Sikhs in New Delhi. Congress party milked this communal carnage to the hilt. Seven years later it has repeated the trade over killing of Rajiv Gandhi and traded his death for votes. In between, it is the congress which started the culture of giving party tickets to the spouses and family members of bereaved party leaders to gain sympathy votes. So who is the real merchant of death here?
Sonias remarks were not really against Modi. She was actually referring to Gujaratis main occupation of trade. She was sating to Gujaratis you are not just traders, but traders of death. It is clear that she hates Hindus and particularly Gujarati Hindus.
Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
RE:Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
by mahendra sapa on Dec 11, 2007 09:45 AM Permalink
What's there to be frighten about. Which state or individual does not like economic prosperity? Along with economic prosperity you will also receive lasting peace.
RE:Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
by ambika on Dec 11, 2007 09:44 AM Permalink
Congress wants to make the whole of India as a Kashmir. Anyday prefer the whole of India becoming a Gujarat.. vibrant Gujarat vibrant India
RE:Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
by Debasis on Dec 11, 2007 09:43 AM Permalink
why are you thinking & propagating negetives, always? be positive, look at the ves of gujrat, same way think ves for the country incl HP & others !!!!!
RE:Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 11, 2007 09:44 AM Permalink
MODI GAVE JYOTIGRAM.
CPIM GAVE NANDIGRAM.
COMMIES KILLED 100 MILLION PEOPLE. YOU SHOULD NOT SHOW YOUR FACE HERE!
RE:Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
by Venu gopal on Dec 11, 2007 09:44 AM Permalink
Sahadevan your party in Kerala earning crores ,killing the innocents at Nandhigrame why you are ignoring the facts?I doubt you are not Sahadevan..
RE:Yesterday Advani said, his aim was to make Himachal another Gujarat. People were very frightened. Now He says I will make India another Gujarat. What is the meaning? Advani is the PM candidate according to Bush's wish.
by Mallik on Dec 11, 2007 09:54 AM Permalink
Are you Sheike Shadevan?
RE:muslims are a burden
by Mohammed Zameer on Dec 11, 2007 10:11 AM Permalink
Mr sajal if u see 20% population is burden on u then i think u cannot survive to live in India, anyways muslims also contributing in indian economy for eg. bollywoods star mostly muslims, Muslims Traders, Azim Premji muslims industrialist and many mores, NRI mostly muslims who are working in Gulfs, etc etc.
As per terrorist activities, we also facing same problems like you, our masjid has also been targeted but ur eyes not open, Mr. Modi openly attacked muslims properties and their belongings after godhra carnage but still thr is no proof of musllims involvement in sabrarmati express train carnaged. Mr. Srikishna report which has clearly given verdict that hindus are responsible for 1992 riots not a muslims and who destroyed babri masjid, but ur eyes not open dear.
Comon dear dont always blames muslims we are just 20% but we are contributing more than other minorities.
RE:RE:muslims are a burden
by madhur varshney on Dec 12, 2007 01:15 PM Permalink
I agree with you Mohammed Zameer. Muslims do contribute their bit to India. But please do not think that entertainment industry is their first contribution - the film industry has decayed in terms of new contributions except for a few sparks here and there ( perhaps the music of A.R. Rehman is one genouine contribution you can boast of as a contribution).
The commerce that you conduct is much better and - though not hyped - louder contribution. i have known a few doctors and engineers of your religion - good ones too. And at least two of my teachers that i say were good at their job - were Muslims. these are your greater pillars and please quote them too when the contributions of Muslims to the nation are asked for.
RE:muslims are a burden
by MirAhmed Shah on Dec 11, 2007 09:54 AM Permalink
My dear Sajal, India is my country as much as it is yours. By mouthing such profanities about the Muslim community you are only hurting our sentiments.I have served in the Army for 34 years, have only two children and pay my taxes regularly. And my best friends are from the majority. I wonder if all this information may enable you to look at your theory afresh. With warm regards. Mir Ahmed.
RE:muslims are a burden
by gurjit singh khangura on Dec 11, 2007 10:02 AM Permalink
Mir Saheb there r very few muslims who think they belong 2 India,I m not trying 2 hurt ur sentiments but its fact & i have seen personally muslim dominated areas putting crackers on & distrubuting sweets if Pakistan wins match.This is basic i dont want 2 elabrote u can understand what mentality u peoplle have.Try & change this,send ur people 2 Schools instead of Madrassas which teaches hatred & only muslim ideology.Muslims need EDUCATION A LOT.
RE:muslims are a burden
by mahendra sapa on Dec 11, 2007 09:48 AM Permalink
Come on that's not true.
In my opinion 95% of muslims are as patriot as any other Indians. The issue is to identify the 5% disgruntled lot, unfortunately it's the moderate and patriot muslims who 'll have to find a way to identify and hand over this 5% lot.
