Re: why subsidize NANO
by shrinivasa on Sep 04, 2008 04:54 PM Permalink
Ms Thapa has rightly exposed the Bania mentality of the Indian industrialists. When it was the licence raj, they kept all competition out by bribing greedy bureaucrats in all the Indian Govts.now even in globalisation they want to get away with thefts of Govt.land by bribing the CMs and PMs of this poor slum we call India. and let me ask you one very vital question- What is Govt. land after all, does it not belong to the people of this country, jointly though ! ?
Why Bengal need TATA NANO project ? The Answer is . 1.TATA NANO project will give direct & indirect employment to the many unemployed youths of Bengal.
2. It will revive industralisation of Bengal 3.It will put Bengal in the world map,because of the cheapest car. 4.Schools ,Colleges will develop in that area 5.Roads and Infrasture will develop. 6.Health Care facility will develop in that area 7.Foreign tourist will increase . 8.It will open the door for prospective foreign investment in Bengal. 9.If people are employed they will not have time to be tool of politician . 10.They will not waste time in local clubs gossiping about useless things , and seeking forced donation from people for thier sustenance. 11.There will be all around social and economic development to the people of the area.
Why Bengal need TATA NANO project ? The Answer is . 1.TATA NANO project will give direct & indirect employment to the many unemployed youths of Bengal.
2. It will revive industralisation of Bengal 3.It will put Bengal in the world map,because of the cheapest car. 4.Schools ,Colleges will develop in that area 5.Roads and Infrasture will develop. 6.Health Care facility will develop in that area 7.Foreign tourist will increase . 8.It will open the door for prospective foreign investment in Bengal. 9.If people are employed they will not have time to be tool of politician . 10.They will not waste time in local clubs gossiping about useless things , and seeking forced donation from people for thier sustenance. 11.There will be all around social and economic development to the people of the area.
Re: Tata Nano Project
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 10:59 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata and cpm. 2. Tata has invested 70,000/- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that. 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploied lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS HE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW.tILL NOW IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH ONE CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE EMPLOYMENT OF AT LEAST 30 PEOPLE CAN BE DONE. WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. AND HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE POLITICAL PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE ANSWERABLE IN A COURT OF LAW. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MANUFACTURE ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCAIONS AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SOMUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN?
7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE WEST BENGAL GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FEE ACCES TO TATAS
Why Bengal need TATA NANO project ? The Answer is . 1.TATA NANO project will give direct & indirect employment to the many unemployed youths of Bengal.
2. It will revive industralisation of Bengal 3.It will put Bengal in the world map,because of the cheapest car. 4.Schools ,Colleges will develop in that area 5.Roads and Infrasture will develop. 6.Health Care facility will develop in that area 7.Foreign tourist will increase . 8.It will open the door for prospective foreign investment to Bengal. 9.If people are employed they will not have time to be tool of politician . 10.They will not waste time in local clubs gossiping about useless things , and seeking forced donation from people for thier sustenance. 11.There will be all around social and economic development to the people of the area.
Why Bengal need TATA NANO project ? The Answer is . 1.TATA NANO project will give direct & indirect employment to the many unemployed youths of Bengal.
2. It will revive industralisation of Bengal 3.It will put Bengal in the world map,because of the cheapest car. 4.Schools ,Colleges will develop in that area 5.Roads and Infrasture will develop. 6.Health Care facility will develop in that area 7.Foreign tourist will increase . 8.It will open the door for prospective foreign investment to Bengal. 9.If people are employed they will not have time to be tool of politician . 10.They will not waste time in local clubs , and seeking forced donation from people for thier sustenance. 11.There will be all around social and economic development to the people of the area.
Re: Tata Nano Project
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:06 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. TILL NOW IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH ONE CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE EMPLOYMENT OF AT LEAST 30 PEOPLE CAN BE DONE. WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. AND HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE POLITICAL PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE ANSWERABLE IN A COURT OF LAW. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN?
7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B. GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCES
Re: Re: Tata Nano Project
by Aman on Sep 07, 2008 03:03 AM Permalink
why do you expect Tata to work on the state's infrastructure. Its state's responsibility to provide a infrastrucure that is required to run a business. Tata or other companies can provide the employment and pay taxes to the governement. And its goverment's responibility to use those collected money to invest in infrastrucure.But none..i.e. Bihar..or WB givt did any thing towards that.Its their problem not the Tatas...
Why should the govt acquire land and pass on to business houses. All the corporates are sitting on heap of money. Industries are well developed. They do not need any support from Gvot. Let them spend on acquiring the land directly. Govt should buy only barren land for the purpose of industrialisation.The concept of SEZ and industrailisation have been misunderstood.In China an industrail zone will comprise of 30,000 acres with forex revenue potentials. In India it is a real estate scam. Even one rupee forex qualifies for SEZ status. Even 10 acres can be called SEZ. WB govt and so many other govts are buying into the corporates plans (which in turn support the elections). Nobody has the right to take away the land forcefully. Mamta is right in her approach. Perhaps she can be considerate to Tata group which is the most transparent and employees friendly and respected corporate group. Look at Jamshedpur. COnsidering the corporate ehtics of Tata Mamta should reconsider her decision. She should definitely oppose reliance and other corporate groups whos contirubution to the society is insignificant rather pittance compared to the benefits they got from the society through all means.
Re: Why support from Govt
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:09 PM Permalink
1. This land grabbing is a scam. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. TILL NOW IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH ONE CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE EMPLOYMENT OF AT LEAST 30 PEOPLE CAN BE DONE. WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. AND HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE POLITICAL PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE ANSWERABLE IN A COURT OF LAW. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN?
7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B. GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS
Re: Why support from Govt
by Avijit Chakraborty on Sep 05, 2008 06:51 PM Permalink
by ac on sep5,2006 6.30p.m Mamta is right in her approach, she only asked to return the land to the owner who are still today not accept the cheque from the govt. as my opinion Tata Motor can easily short out this problem just increase of Rs.10000/- per car for a year. as per report from singur they will produce 250000 car. Now this money they can directly distribute among these 1000 acre land owner and permanent employment for a one person from each family with a bond that the fellow must look after his parents as well as his brother and sister.
Please understand what India needs today is employment and a huge opportunity was created in singur. 4000 people were employed ad trained. but now they will be jobless.
I will request that somebody go to singur and see the poverty over their. people eat boiled rice in all their three meals they dont have anything else.
How many jobs has government provided to them, what agricultural growth have we seen since independence for them. they were eating boiled rice in 1947 and they are eating boiled rice in 2008, what has changed for them.
Tata by setting up a plant provided them a opportunity for employment.
Ask mamta to set up a society who will procure their rice in a good price and sell them outside. people dont have a penny with them.
It would be interesting to compare the value systems of BATA with those of Ratan TATA.
Bata had sent two of his sales managers to Africa to explore footwear potential in that continent.
The firs manager replied-No one wears any footwear of any kind here. There is absolutely no market for our Company!
The second manager replied-No one wears any footwear of any kind here. We can sell all our varities of footwear here. The whole market is ours!
The rest is history!
Ratan Tata saw a man driving a two-wheeler with a kid standing between handlebar and the driver with his wife sitting in the pillion with a toddler in her lap! Ratan Tata conceived the idea of Nano for 1 Lac.
Ratan Tata said I dont like to see the family die even in a minor slip of the two wheeler.
Thomas Bata was more candid. There is a business potential and I will sell all my footwear to Africans. He didnt say, My heart bleeds whenever I see Africans bleeding feet; I will ensure to protect their feet. He just admitted there is a great business potential and encashed it by offering the legendary Bata pricing of .99 cents (paise)aks Ratan Tatas a Car for a Lac! Africans paid and bought Batas foot wear but no African said Thomas Bata protected our feet from bleeding! Let us award him Africa Ratna!
Ratan Tata instead of admiting seeing a huge business potential twisted it into a social service kind of statement!
Re: Thomas BATA vs Ratan TATA
by Dipak Bose on Sep 04, 2008 08:21 AM Permalink
I have never thought that BATA is a foreign company. It is just as Indian as Hindustan Motors. Yes, I agree both Thomas Bata and Ratan Tata are great men, workers are happy to work for them.
Re: Thomas BATA vs Ratan TATA
by anirban bandyopadhyay on Sep 04, 2008 06:30 AM Permalink
See this guy, he wants to prove that Ratan Tata is not a good guy, and he should not be given Bharat Ratna.
Why dont you suggest Sayeed Abdullah Bukhari for nobel peace prize?
Re: Thomas BATA vs Ratan TATA
by sudhir chauhan on Sep 04, 2008 10:03 AM Permalink
Yes he is a business man and a man who has given lot to India, contributed with open heart in all the three wars that we fought.
he is a simple man - he does not rides in mercedes but in a simple Indigo, he prefers to eat his lunch in common canteen in the factory with others. he is not like any other business man.
he has done what government could not do in remote areas - providing opportunity for employment and that is the most important thing India needs today.
Re: Thomas BATA vs Ratan TATA
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:17 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE W.B GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH ONE CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SME EMPLOYMENT OF AT LEAST 30 PEOPLE CAN BE DONE. WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. AND HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE ANSWERABLE IN A COURT OF LAW. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN? 7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B. GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS TO TATAS. 8.Some 650 acres more at Rajarhat?
he is a perfect gentleman& very down to Earth person. But mamata has crossed all limits to push her own petty motive that has made us to see such a sorrowful day. Mamata should be blacklisted from politics.I Tell mr Tata to reconsider the decision & we will be highly obliged if he does so.
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by smart alec on Sep 04, 2008 01:34 AM Permalink
Sukanya, It's a pity your heart is bleeding for the poor "perfect gentleman and down to earth person"! Please accept the fact that he is a businessman who wants to get the government to do all the dirty work and get him cheap land and then pretend to be the messaiah of massess by choking our roads with cars (God knows the quality of the cars or the final pricing of it) and killing the future of generations to come...Please dont eulogise these multi-billionaires whose only urge is to accumulate more and more...and look at the support he is getting from his industry colleagues..from the likes of mukesh ambani who's splurging 2 billion USD (9000 crore Rs) on his stupid house...wats the 1500 crore project in front of one man's house..if you see the kind of money these "persecuted" lot lot splurge on just their exotic lifestyle you wont be licking their boots instead of dressing the wounds of millions of persecuted poor and landless farmers...please get your priorities right..
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by sn mukherjee on Sep 04, 2008 08:31 AM Permalink
that was the real point. nobody thinks of the poor farmers. everybody is very eager to blame mamta and stand. people wont die if he doesnt ride a 1 lac or 1.5 lac car. why mr. tata doesnt stand up and say he will give 1 crore per acre for the land he is taking from the farmers. why he wants the govt to get him the land and that too at such a cheap price.
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by Amit Thakkar on Sep 04, 2008 09:49 AM Permalink
dear sn mukherjee and smart alec
pls keep in mind couple of things before shooting comments.
WB govt committed land before project started. why the hell they accepted to acquire land for tata at first place. and why the hell they accepted to take such a low price from tata for land. second...WB govt knew that many villages would need to be shifted for this project then why the hell this was not considered at first place.
the pain which we all feel is that after spending 1500 cr, u r back to square one. WB govt / mamata should have taken these step well in advance only.
try to understand....this all are politics....
another thing....u cry about cars...pollution...etc but accept this thing....u cant leave city and stay in forest....being a part of a city, u also contribute to pollution. Regarding quality of cars...it it is bad then only fool would buy it (dont worry about that...we all are intelligent creatures).
Another thing....mukesh ambani spending 9000 cr for his house....so whats a big deal...its his money and he has full right to spend it wherever he wants....I personnaly dont give money to poor for buying food but I may give money for education. Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by Pravin Suryawanshi on Sep 04, 2008 10:03 AM Permalink
Dear Mukharjee, u r right on your place.But y u r unable to judge about future? If one Tata co. stared working,there was definitely chance of growth in all aspects.Living standard, economical-industrial growth & development...Because of few Dull & stupid politicians we india always faced problems.Truelly mamta made WB sickk.....Mamata ye kya aur kyun kiya tune?????
Re: Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:40 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH 1 CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SME AT LEAST 30 PERSONS CAN BE EMPLOYED.WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COURT. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS[PUNE] AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN? REAL ESTATE? 7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B.GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS TO TATAS.
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by sudhir chauhan on Sep 04, 2008 09:58 AM Permalink
Please understand what India needs today is employment and a huge opportunity was created in singur. 4000 people were employed ad trained. but now they will be jobless.
I will request that somebody go to singur and see the poverty over their. people eat boiled rice in all their three meals they dont have anything else.
How many jobs has government provided to them, what agricultural growth have we seen since independence for them. they were eating boiled rice in 1947 and they are eating boiled rice in 2008, what has changed for them.
Tata by setting up a plant provided them a opportunity for employment.
Ask mamta to set up a society who will procure their rice in a good price and sell them outside. people dont have a penny with them.
Re: Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
WELL SAID
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH 1 CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SME AT LEAST 30 PERSONS CAN BE EMPLOYED.WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COURT. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS[PUNE] AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN? REAL ESTATE? 7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B.GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS TO TATAS.
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by mrigank on Sep 03, 2008 11:33 PM Permalink
govt of w/b failed to safe guards the public property and lifeboth the govt and opposition(mamta) dont want tata n singur
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by Dipak Bose on Sep 04, 2008 08:22 AM Permalink
Singur could be the next Jamshedpur, but because of Mamata that opportunity is lost.
Re: Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by Pravin Suryawanshi on Sep 04, 2008 10:05 AM Permalink
yes you are very correct Dipak...
Re: Ratan Tata is a very perfect gentleman unlike scavanger mamata
by ramoo on Sep 04, 2008 11:36 PM Permalink
1. You are a big chamcha of Tata. 2. Tata has invested 70,000- crores in eastern India but only 140 cores in west Bengal in the last 140 years since 1868. Has Bengal starved due to that? 3. Tata has not made a difference to the adivasis of Jamshedpur. They are a exploited lot till today. 4. If TATA HAD NOT BEEN GIVEN INCENTIVES WHICH ARE UNTHINKABLE FOR OTHER STATES THEN THEY WOULD NOT HAVE COME TO BENGAL. HOW MUCH OF OUR MONEY HAS tHE WEST BENGAL GOVT GIVEN AWAY TO THE TATAS THAT WE OUGHT TO KNOW. IT SEEMS NOTHING LESS THAN A FEW THOUSAND CRORES. 4. WITH 1 CRORE INVESTMENT IN A SME AT LEAST 30 PERSONS CAN BE EMPLOYED.WITH 4000 CRORES INCENTIVE TO SMES ANOTHER 8000 CRORES INVESTMENT COULD HAVE COME. HENCE ABOUT 3,60,000 JOBS COULD HAVE BEEN CREATED. 5. THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING SUCH BONANZA TO THE TATAS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO COURT. 6. THE TATAS ARE NOT GOING TO MNF ANY CAR HERE IN SINGUR IT WILL ONLY BE A ASSEMBLY LINE OF PARTS MADE FROM OTHER LOCATIONS[PUNE] AND SOME ANCILLARIES IN SINGUR. 6. WHY SO MUCH EXTRA LAND HAS BEEN TAKEN? REAL ESTATE? 7. THE JINDALS HAVE NOT MADE A FUSS ABOUT THEIR MUCH GREATER INVESTMENT IN COMPARISON TO THE TATAS. THEIR PLANT AT SALBONI WILL DEVELOP THE SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE OF SALBONI,- ADIVASIS AND TRIBALS WILL BENEFIT, WHICH DID NOT HAVE ANYTHING. THE TATAS WILL NOT DEVELOP OR HAVE DEVELOPED ANY INFRASTRUCTURE AT SINGUR. IT IS THE W.B.GOVT WHO HAVE USED OUR MONEY TO GIVE FREE ACCESS TO TATAS.
