Aussies are racist and so is ICC. Steve was influenced by the racist OZs. SO whatever BCCI did was right. Steve, this should be a lesson in your life: dont support racism.
Well, for the first time in history, BCCI used its financial clout for a right reason.!!! He is more unequal than any equal umpire should be.. crap.. he did not even refer a third umpire decision for a run out against S. Africa.. error or plain malice.. happy that pest is retiring.. GOOD RIDDANCE.!!!
just ask hime to see the replay of the match again. He claims that 94 percent of the decisions were ringht. But the decisions given to india were 100% blunders. Most importantly it costed the match for us.since australians were too happy with those things, Mr.Bucknor seeks their media to disguise his blunder in big time!!!!
Bucknors errors ensured India lost both the sydney test as well as the series. He always gives dubious decision against Indians, and thanks to BCCI, he was removed just in time. Else India would have lost the Perth test also!!
Re: Dont forget Bucknor cost India the series!
by ram kumar on Mar 17, 2009 01:09 PM
u seem to be balberring everywhere.y were u talking nonsense abt lara.do u knw any thing abt cricket
Re: Re: Dont forget Bucknor cost India the series!
by ram kumar on Mar 17, 2009 01:11 PM
dnt be too nationalistic and blind suporter.try to be sensible.
Re: Re: Dont forget Bucknor cost India the series!
by ram kumar on Mar 17, 2009 01:10 PM
and u were saying lara had scored runs only against prased and agrakr?grestes joke of the century.
Mr.Bucknor, When you say that some people are more equal than others,do you consider the other side of the coin as well.Why is it that only indians have been on the wrong side of things?...why is it so that of the 10% wrong decisions you give happen to be against indians only?...I know indians are emotional people but then you as an umpire should take that into consideration the no. of times you rebuked parthiv patel went on to appeal.
Sometimes things are hard to digest coz they are ingrained into ones thought process and perception....Hope you understand!
Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by aman malhotra on Mar 17, 2009 12:59 PM
** I know indians are emotional people but then you as an umpire should take that into consideration,i am referring to the no. of times you rebuked parthiv patel whenever he used to appeal during the 2004 series in Aus....and bytheway we didnt hold any grudges against you before that,it was your consistency in inconsistentcy(umpiring decisions) against india that cost you.
Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by aman malhotra on Mar 17, 2009 12:56 PM
know indians are emotional people but then you as an umpire should take that into consideration,i am referring to the no. of times you rebuked parthiv patel whenever he used to appeal during the 2004 series in Aus.
Re: Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by Amit Jha on Mar 17, 2009 01:36 PM
If ICC can do all nonsense. Y cant BCCI do the same. Has Cricket australia ever admitted their player`s fault even if it was clearly evident they were at fault. This is the difference between india and australia. Australian players get support no matter wat they do. But indians will always be against our own cricketers and cricket board even if we are not totally wrong. So australia is no. 1 cos the support they get all the time and not their game. In last 1 year they got less support and u can see their performance has dipped big time.
Re: Re: Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by shan mugam on Mar 17, 2009 03:09 PM
Amit, you are in which part of the world. It's Aus who brought the Rule for player behavior (You know how many time Warne been fined for his activity), Just look at the recent episode Symonds (having Issue with B.McCullam) not taking part of Net Session and team meeting and M.Hayden calling Bajji obnoxious Weed - They were all fined heavily. But Look at Bajji Episode in IPL - What was the punishment for him from BCCI.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by Samson Tellis on Mar 17, 2009 03:29 PM
firstly sreesant deserved it..and secondly the Indian premier league has no obligation to the ICC.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by Amit Jha on Mar 18, 2009 11:54 AM
Bhajji was thrown out of IPL which means a huge money for him. I`m sure symonds might not have been fined this much in this entire career. Also on camera everyone just saw sreesanth crying. No one saw bhajji slapping him so how do u say what sree spoke to bhajji that provoked him to do so. I still stand by india saying. What india lacks is support from indian viewers in difficult times. Otherwise it is a better team than aussies. Aussies may have brought the rule for player behaviour after they have done enough of the damage to the cricketing spirit.
Re: Bucknor....Maybe you WERE at fault
by aman malhotra on Mar 17, 2009 12:58 PM
** I know indians are emotional people but then you as an umpire should take that into consideration,i am referring to the no. of times you rebuked parthiv patel whenever he used to appeal during the 2004 series in Aus....and bytheway we didnt hold any grudges against you before that,it was your consistency in inconsistentcy(umpiring decisions) against india that cost you.
