THAT IS THE RESULT WHEN UMPIRES & ICC WERE GIVEN A BIT OF HARD LESSON IN UMPIRING. ICC SHOULD DELETE 2ND TEST WHICH AUSTRALIA WON BY OUTRIGHT CHEATING. NOW THE WHOLE CRICKETING WORLD SHOULD REALISE HOW AUSTRALIA WINS MATCHES AGAINST ALL THE OTHER COUNTRIES. IN THE PAST GARY SOBERS COMMENTED THAT IN PAKISTAN, ANY OPPONENT HAS TO PLAY WITH 13 PLAYERS. BUT AGAINST AUSTRALIA, OPPONENTS HAVE TO PLAY WITH 11 PLAYERS 2 UMPIRES WHOLE OF ICC TEAM. THATS WORST THAN PAKISTAN. GOD KNOWS WHAT SOBERS WOULD SAY (SHOULD HAVE SAID) AGAINST AUSTRALIA. FOR AUSTRALIANS, DISHONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY.
RE:India's Wind against Australia
by sam on Jan 19, 2008 11:20 PM
shut up you idiot. you didnt see the third test match at perth on the 4th day. three decisions went in favor of india symonds, hussey and lee. but still look at australians they are still saying that india played well
RE:India's Wind against Australia
by Kaushik Basu on Jan 19, 2008 11:29 PM
My dear Lee's wicket was caught I don't think you saw the match live, as the hot spot showed it hit the bat and then pad. Moreover Lee walked. About Symond's he was not out and Hussey's case was doubtful, so was Sachin's in the first innigs. You all miss the whole point. In the second test the point was not of wrong decision, but if all wrong decisions at crucial points goes against a team and that too very obvious decisions, eg decision made by the third umpire, not calling third umpire and hugest of huge nicks, on the other way giving caught to someone who hasn't even toched the ball, that really raises the suspecion.
RE:India's Wind against Australia
by Sam on Jan 19, 2008 11:42 PM
Ashwin, Sorry I take it back. Noe I looked at the reply aagin. Yes hussey, lee and symonds were out. In fact sachin was not out in the first inning and India or sachin did not said anything about it. Thats call Indian spirit. They do not cry for human error. But what Bucknor did in second test was not human error.
chappel destryed the team saying , seniors r not allowing the junior players...but the seniors have proved they back up the juniors players...CHAPPEL THE REAL CULPRIT
RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by . on Jan 19, 2008 11:15 PM
rightly said. ishant proved his worth even as a 19 year old. good keep it up. persist with him.
RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by Aussie Ki Taise on Jan 19, 2008 11:14 PM
hussey and ricky averages r so high becoz umpires dont easily give them out ..give the same chance to sachin and dravid..their average will be higher than ricky and hussey
RE:RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by sam on Jan 19, 2008 11:24 PM
you are such an indian idiot, you people dont appreciate any team. even the best of the talents you have in your country and you are still crying. india was, is and will be a cry baby all its life. you dont remember the 2003 finals when ponting thrashed india, he is the second best batsmen in the world after tendulkar and you still cry.
RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by Naveen Singh on Jan 20, 2008 01:32 AM
Sam this is not cry but actually is a mirror reaction due to bad behavour of Australian team.
RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by sam on Jan 19, 2008 11:21 PM
you are playing cricket dumb ass, it doesnt matter whether he is 19 hrs or 30 yrs. cricket is beyond all ages, if you are 19 to be in the team, you are a good player. it was against a bowler and a batsmen, in which ishant did really good.
RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by Rationalist on Jan 20, 2008 12:09 AM
True. Wheather 19 yrs or 37 yrs. No one will give discount for age. Talent is beyond age.There is nothing to be ashamed about that. Being 19 yrs is only an advantage especially for a fast bowler.
RE:1 hour torture for ricky pointing
by sam on Jan 19, 2008 11:49 PM
Sorry for my above post. Actually I am dumb ass that I wrote above comment. Ponting is nothing but the disgrace to the world of cricket. I used to make fun of Ishant. But now I realized that Ponting is very afraid of Ishant. Hope he do not play any racist trick against Inshant like he and Symmonds played against harbhajan in second test.
chappel destryed the team saying , seniors r not allowing the junior players...but the seniors have proved they back up the juniors players...CHAPPEL THE REAL CULPRIT
Guess if u have different opinion The credit for this remarkable indian victory goes to AUSTRALIAN TRIO....Ponting, Symonds and Clark bcoz due to them SPLITTED team india got united with overwhelming support from all corners of the world......
We are proud of u Ponting and company....I hope u ll repeat such acts team india will give u the bitter taste of defeat again and again....hahahahah
Why Indians do nt win matches when sachin scores?? At adeliade latime when dravid got 233 india have won but at sysdney when sachin got 241 india did not win why?? whyd oes not india put up gus show when sachin gets 100's
RE:Sachin is the best..But when ever Sachin scores why india losses..in Sydeny at 345/7 he guided india to 532 and scored 154*...still india lost
by Bob Gordon on Jan 19, 2008 11:38 PM
The same question always bothers me too. Wonder how Sachin must be feeling when India loses after he makes a big score, Unfortunatley, many people blame him whenever it happens.
Normally, one should not change a winning team. But, Jaffer was a tourist in Perth. Also, I think Laxman should play at #3 because he is in great form and can make a big score. At #6 he will run out of partners.
RE:Team for Adelaide.
by Sameer on Jan 19, 2008 11:07 PM
if u say jafar is tourist then dada also toursit jafar made more run comapre to dada that does not means bring yuvraj instead of data, so do not think noncence, this are the 2 regular opener, sehvag/jafar. no need to change,
