It is not only India. Match refrees are against Asians and they justify for let off of Lara. When Shane warne shout for every ball and continues shouting staring at the Umpire no action is take.The developing and the underdeveloped will always be the victim of aparthied of the developed nations.
The Indian cricket board has to take up the matter seriously with ICC about the poor quality and partisan match referees.Why should only our players always get the stick and fines from this type of referees.They should keep in mind that but for India the game of cricket would have been in the dumps by now and our players are the most docile of the entire lot.
i appeal to rediff and and all such web sites wherever such messages are posted that they should please sens a CD of all such messages to Shri Sharad Pawar our board president that its time to act and stnad up for your players rather then playing merry go round with Jagmohan Dalmiya.
The 3rd Umpire was appointed when both the umpires in the field have doubt or not able to take decision. When he has not able to perform his duty why he should be paid the full match fees. His duty is to take decision, if he is having the doubt, the doubt should be in favour of batsmen, irrespective of the countries and thats what the umpires in field has done. Hence the problem arises. If the 3rd umpire itself had taken this decision there is no chance of creating this kind of scenes. Since the 3rd umpire has not performed his duty properly and he is the sole responsible for the scenes created that day, hence his match fees should be cut down.
what the use is asking the views of indian public, when it wont make any effect in ICC... what the hell is BCCI doing?... why they keep on licking the asses of these whites... it took the insult meted out by Dave Richardson silently, when he said that not a single Indian umpire is good enough to be selected on the ICC panel.. while they dont find anything wrong with allowing the biased and dumb Steve Bucknor dole out seriously flawed decisions and statements
The behaviour of B.Lara on the first test match calls for punishment. Now that he is not punished, it shows that ICC is having a different set of rules for different players, different country. If he was frustrated, so what, his action showed dissent 7 he should have been fined.
ICC defense of its stupid decision on Lara must be taken up on the highest level vis a vis the case of sehwag. we indians today control the game at least commercially but it seems ICC does not think twice against repeateadly doing the same error. they should be reminded of South africa where half a dozen indians were fined or censure while donald went of scott free same is the case here. so next time i appeal to all players at leastto indians that if they do not like the decison of the umpire they should snatch the ball from the umpire. let icc penalise the entire indian team
RE:match refree
by Jairam on Jun 14, 2006 08:53 PM Permalink
Hey, don't dream of Dalmia being able to do anything with the ICC. He was a bigger puppet in their hands. What did he do when under Ganguly, half the indian team was penalised by Denis Amiss?
